this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2023
173 points (88.8% liked)

politics

19089 readers
4402 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Vice.com

all 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TehWorld@lemmy.world 65 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because the government can’t afford a book of matches?

[–] moonsnotreal@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 1 year ago

Not in this economy

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Like the "Jewish space lasers" bullshit that Margarine Traitor Greed mentioned.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If we had space lasers, we’d use them in Ukraine.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Jews won't use their space lasers to help Ukraine because Ukraine is full of Nazis. /s

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Flawless logic.

[–] FormerlyChucks@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

But that would put the US into direct conflict with Russia. Military lasers are definitely a thing

[–] SulaymanF@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

They don’t exist at the magnitude you think. We don’t have space lasers that can attack ground targets yet and probably never will. At best they can jam certain systems like drones.

[–] discodoubloon@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean we could, but we’d secretly have to get four battery modules each the size of the international space station into orbit.

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Only for solid state lasers. There are other kinds though. But they would still be fairly impractical and heavy to have in orbit. And wouldn't be good for much more than one shot

[–] FormerlyChucks@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think you underestimate current military capabilities which are decades beyond public knowledge tech.

[–] SulaymanF@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Physics does have some solid limits though. The amount of power required for lasers to travel miles through atmosphere is massive.

[–] stephen01king@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago

But if it's the same space lasers they are using on Maui that nobody seems to be able to detect it's source, then wouldn't the same thing apply if they used it on Russia?

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 year ago

Hey, those are real! /s

[–] gmtom@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago

I know this will fall on deaf ears, but the best thing we can do is stop amplifying these people by posting these stories and upvoting them.

[–] Gingerlegs@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Everything is a conspiracy since the internet became a “news” source

[–] MajesticSloth@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think the same people would think the same stuff. Just now they travel faster and wider.

[–] RaineV1@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think bouncing ideas off of each other on social media does drive them further into the rabbit hole, and leads them to ideas they might not have gotten to otherwise.

[–] TehWorld@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

One person starts saying things as a joke or as a griefer and people run with it.

[–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's how the flat Earth thing got its resurgence online. It was fucking joke that got taken way too far and now has "followers" that believe it.

[–] pseudorandom@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Trump too. The_Donald started that way.

[–] Atrabiliousaurus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You Can't Stump the Trump (Volume 4).

It was all fun and games and centipedes and 420 sniper headshot dubstep memes. And then shit got real.

[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 1 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/MKH6PAoUuD0

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.

[–] snooggums@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

And posting on the internet is like shouting into the void, except more people can hear idiots online than on their shitty AM broadcast.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 8 points 1 year ago

Yeah, just because they're posting it on Twitter instead of ranting on street corners doesn't make it a news story.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.one 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

And when they finally do determine the cause, nobody will ever believe them.

Edit I want to say too, that photo is heartbreaking. It's NOT a black and white photo. I zoomed in on a little spot of red... it was a stop sign.

[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

The wall of flame was reaching speeds of 80 mph.

That's unfathomable to me.

[–] TehWorld@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There are reports that it was downed power lines. It was super windy which is what also caused it to move so rapidly and with such ferocity.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.one 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I saw that video tonight, would not be surprising!

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I hate to make the comparison with this photo, but all I can think of with the stop sign in the middle is the scene with the little girl in the red coat in Schindler's List.

oh shit, man that just messed with my head so bad

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Which only proves how stupid they are. There is no need for lasers if a simple cigarette but thrown away carelessly is sufficient.

[–] SlowNoPoPo@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Or a downed power line, how hard is that to believe

[–] tuxiy@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The fact that my mom actually believes this 💀💀💀

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My mom thinks Biden’s a robot. So…

[–] FaeDrifter@midwest.social -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's ridiculous, an AI would be way more coherent than Biden.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Ignorance is a disease. The curiosity for education is the only answer. But our Prussian inspired educational system and capitalism doesn’t give us the tools to even begin to combat it.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They said the same thing about Canada's fires 👍

[–] echodot 3 points 1 year ago

It's amazing they haven't come up with a more practical way of starting fires.

[–] echodot 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes but conspiracy theorists think that radio waves create atomic structures, so I think it's pretty clear they'll believe any old nonsense.

[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The government do not have those types of lasers.

[–] Zoboomafoo@yiffit.net 4 points 1 year ago

Because the Jews operate them?

[–] Red_October@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Yes, that's the crazy part of this, the idea that the government doesn't have access to those types of lasers.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

That’s what they want you to think.

[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Jesus fuck.

[–] jerome@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Republicans only attack America to make Biden look bad. So they should start there.