this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2023
281 points (94.9% liked)

politics

19088 readers
3885 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Politico

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] xerazal@lemmy.zip 130 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't know how anyone can genuinely believe that Republicans are for small government and say the competition is good when they're using government to stifle competition.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 51 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If you know nothing you'll believe anything.

[–] Rockyrikoko@lemm.ee 22 points 1 year ago

Follow that with "Anyone who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities”... and you start to get a feel for the playbook the GOP is using

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 74 points 1 year ago (5 children)

These backward-ass clowns are going to be the bane of this world.

[–] mriguy@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I would have gone with backward ass-clowns, but both are good.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 56 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"This law was bought for you by Big Oil and the Koch Brothers"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] azn03@lemm.ee 52 points 1 year ago (8 children)

“We’re moving so fast to electric vehicles, we’re just making the problems worse,” said state Rep. Jim Gooch (R), the longtime chair of Kentucky’s House energy committee. Those problems are multiplying, he added, as public officials look to electrify government fleets — especially transit systems and school districts.

“I certainly don’t want to put my kids on a school bus that’s electric. I just don’t want to do it,” Gooch said. “And I’ll fight in any way I can to make sure that that’s not something Kentucky’s doing.”

What? Why would you not want your kids going on a bus that has zero exhaust? School busses that use diesel straight smell like crap and it's absolutely hot af in the south. After reading this quote I was like, this world is so fucked.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] aegis_sum@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He said he just doesn't want to, ok?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 year ago

Kentucky

That explains everything

[–] EddoWagt@feddit.nl 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In the city where I live, almost all public transport buses are electric. Honestly for a bus it's so much better than diesel, they're quiet, don't vibrate and ride much smoother

[–] soEZ@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

They can also leverage regen due to constant stopping, don't get high drag penalty due to low speeds, etc. seems like good application for EV. Makes no sense as you said.

[–] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

To add to that, does anyone here remember those bus fire drills that you had to do once a year?

I remember having to walk a quarter mile away from the propane buses in case they blew. Much more boomy than the diesel or gasoline buses which would only burn you to death!

[–] pottedmeat7910@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

There's a guy who is definitely has a hoard of incandesant light bulbs in his garage.

[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I'll tell you why; because oil lobbyists paid him to be against EVs and he has no actual reason to be against EVs.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fuck this shit, but also did anyone else do a double take when they read this?

“It’s a barrier to adoption,” said Albert Gore, executive director of the Zero Emission Transportation Association, a trade group.

I had to look him up.

[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Oh no sir, I must say you're wrong. I'm Gal Bore, absolutely no relation whatsoever to the very handsome former vice president.

[–] EndOfLine@lemm.ee 33 points 1 year ago

Supporters say it ensures every driver pays their fair share. But the fee is nearly double what an average driver would pay in taxes at the pump, according to consumer advocates.

Sounds like the foundation for legal challenges from EV manufacturers.

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (35 children)

Can we just invest in public transit while taxing the fuck out of personal vehicles as well as cease subsiding oil, ffs?

load more comments (35 replies)
[–] FoxBJK@midwest.social 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I live in one of these states that charges $100 for hybrids annually. Annoying as hell but I save so much on gas that it's worth it. I get the argument that gas taxes pay for road maintenance, but this whole thing isn't going to be sustainable in the long run.

[–] wesley@yall.theatl.social 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

The taxes should probably be based on some combination of usage and gross vehicle weight. People driving more with heavy vehicles ought to pay a larger share of road maintenance. A gas tax somewhat handles this since people with larger vehicles who drive more will use more gas.

But the gas taxes don't even cover all of the money spent on maintaining/upgrading the roads. Roads are very expensive especially when you have these large highway interchange projects. We should really be trying to get people away from driving cars and onto transit, biking, walking etc. as much as possible

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SCB@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

State lawmakers imposed the new fee on EVs this spring to replace gasoline taxes lost to the switch to battery-powered vehicles

This is a good thing, but poorly-implemented. Should instead be tied to mileage driven.

[–] Zoboomafoo@yiffit.net 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Some function of axle weight and mileage would probably be the best combination

[–] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

Or recognize the roads and related infrastructure as a public good and use general funds to pay for it instead of leaning into a user pay model.

load more comments
view more: next ›