this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2024
123 points (96.9% liked)

Food Crimes - Offenses against nutrition

2160 readers
29 users here now

Welcome to Food Crimes! This community is here to collect all and any post about cursed food and generally unusual consumables.

Right now, here’s the rules:

  1. Posts must include an image or video containing food or drink.
  2. It must be unusual or cursed in some way. a. For example, something like Doritos Milk would be unusual, but normal milk would not.
  3. No AI posts whatsoever, and any images that were altered (Ex: Photoshop, Gimp) need to be tagged.

How to tag: To tag your posts, please prepend or append the tag name inside square brackets. For example,[OC] Foo bar baz or foo bar baz [Meta] would be acceptable. Multiple tags will require separate pairs of brackets, like so: [Edited][OC] foo bar baz

Here are the current tags:

Finished checking out all the posts here? Also checkout !shittyfoodporn@lemmy.ca!

(BTW, I’m looking for someone to help mod here! I myself would not be enough if this community goes beyond a few posts a day.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 33 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)
[–] rbos@lemmy.ca 19 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Yeah, like, how is that a selling point?

[–] TragicNotCute@lemmy.world 28 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Texas chili doesn’t have beans. It’s absolutely a selling point.

[–] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 19 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

So the original 'chili Queens" who brought chili con carne to Texas sometimes added beans. It was often used as a topping for tamales. If you go back further, pretty much as far as you can go on this particular subject, the Aztecs, Incas, and Mayans all had precursor dishes that were meat, peppers, spices, and beans. Delicious proto chili!

Beans have been a part of chili since the beginning. You can't add them for a lot of competitions, but that doesn't make the off-competition stuff any less authentic. Central Texas gets weird about it, but they get weird about a lot of shit. They're the ones who took the recipe from tejanas and removed the beans in the first place.

That being said, I prefer a chili with no beans. You can skip the rest of this comment because it's just a guy who is now reminiscing about chili past and thinking of chili future.

I will take a bunch of peppers I've grown (usually super hot, but I have some guajillos and jalapenos in the mix this year) and smoke them, yellow onion, garlic, beer, cayenne, masa harina, strong coffee, a collection of spices to make my own chili powder (not a secret, I just don't have my recipe card in front of me....it heavily features smoked paprika and cumin), a little homemade adobo sauce, homemade bacon, and whatever leftover beef I have (usually brisket, sometimes chuck, and around the holidays rib roast) cut into little cubes and cooked up. I don't think I've made chili with beef that wasn't leftovers for a couple of decades.

It takes probably half an hour of work, then half a day of simmering stirring very occasionally, then mix in the masa harina 15 or 20 minutes before you're ready to serve.

[–] TragicNotCute@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

I appreciate the history lesson and the delicious sounding recipe.

[–] Guntrigger@sopuli.xyz 6 points 4 months ago

I think most of the world finds it to be an odd selling point.

[–] rbos@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 months ago

TIL, thanks.

[–] Rusty@lemmy.ca 9 points 4 months ago
[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 24 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I can hear the sound of it slowly sliding out of the can, being slowed by suction, and then breaking free and falling into the plate with a splat.

[–] Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works 27 points 4 months ago

Sschhhhhloooooouuup

[–] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 17 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

If I wasn't hungry before, I'm certainly not hungry now.

[–] TragicNotCute@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

It looks like hot ass, but real talk, pretty tasty.

[–] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 4 months ago

I've eaten hot ass. This just looks like septic tank sludge.

[–] MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net 1 points 4 months ago

IIRC, this just tasted like "burnt." (Picture is a few years old.)

[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 17 points 4 months ago

I mean, I've had texans make stuff that looked just like that and then proclaim themselves chili gods.

Texas seems to think they own chili, btw. Kinda silly that this brand hasn't been boycotted like hell.

[–] k0mprssd@lemmy.zip 17 points 4 months ago

where are the fritos???

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 9 points 4 months ago

I feel like no one that's offended by this has ever made their own chili. When chili is made right, beans or not, it should be about this consistency when it's room temperature. Chili is supposed to be a main course, not a soup, and it's not supposed to be thin.

Having used Wolf brand chili before, it's just fine once it's heated up. It's solidly okay as canned chili.

[–] m3t00@midwest.social 7 points 4 months ago

Lived there a few years back in 1980s. cornbread has jalapenos and goes with chili.

my Texas pill tray

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

Looks recycled...

[–] voracitude@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

I think we found the poster child for the switch to bug-based food production.

[–] TheRagingGeek@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Given it's a conagra brand, pretty sure there's a nonzero amount of bug parts. At least it is bean free, so also less likely to be infused with rocks

[–] MacNCheezus@lemmy.today 4 points 4 months ago

Just like momma used to make

[–] bquintb@midwest.social 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)