this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2024
662 points (99.1% liked)

politics

19072 readers
4972 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 167 points 4 months ago (3 children)

And after jerking off her date in a public venue

[–] worldwidewave@lemmy.world 51 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Sex ed’s not gonna help too much with this one.

A handy’s generally one of the safest forms of sex, and I don’t think they tell you where to have sex in school, at least they didn’t when I was around.

[–] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 36 points 4 months ago

No but we’re sitting and saying kids should never learn about sex, and then doing this in public w children on-site which inevitably spurs questions, I’d imagine

[–] andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works 23 points 4 months ago (1 children)

She was juicing the beetle.

[–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 8 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

Thank god she wasn’t juicing the weasel

Or … wheezin the juice

[–] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)
[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

No wheezing the juice!

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 7 points 4 months ago

Honestly, that's a significant improvement over the sex ed we get here in Texas.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 74 points 4 months ago (2 children)

The teen pregnancies are the point

[–] ChowJeeBai@lemmy.world 23 points 4 months ago

If they spend all their alimony surviving and taking care of their kid, they can't spend time thinking about the shite job the republicans are doing.

[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

Keep them poor, keep them ignorant and profit.

[–] Delusional@lemmy.world 71 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Yeah but that's just basic republican 101, be a massive fucking hypocrite about everything.

[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 22 points 4 months ago

Republican logic: "I get to tell you what to do, but you didn't get to tell me what to do."

[–] asteriskeverything@lemmy.world -2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Sorry to be pedantic but this isn't being a hypocrite is it? I see it more like absolute ignorance, tiger ate my face, refusal to acknowledge science data and facts, etc that is also all very republican 101. But for once idk how hypocrite just thr extra layer of stupid

Edit (and gonna reply to this edit the same thing cuz lemmy sucks at showing them and this is important) Ok I read another comment and it definitely put into context for me how this is hypocrital too!!!! They wanna protect the children while doing this shit in unexpected places in front of children where it is much more graphic, traumatizing, and upsetting than the sanitized facts you're getting , in an environment you're anticipating and prepared for it and can sorta joke with classmates too ....

They wanna outlaw that but she's down to whip a dick out and get sloppy in public.

[–] asteriskeverything@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

Edit (and gonna reply to this edit the same thing cuz lemmy sucks at showing them and this is important) Ok I read another comment and it definitely put into context for me how this is hypocrital too!!!! They wanna protect the children while doing this shit in unexpected places in front of children where it is much more graphic, traumatizing, and upsetting than the sanitized facts you're getting , in an environment you're anticipating and prepared for it and can sorta joke with classmates too ....

They wanna outlaw that but she's down to whip a dick out and get sloppy in public.

[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 37 points 4 months ago (3 children)

I didn't know that her teenage son had gotten pregnant.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 50 points 4 months ago

That's how bad it can get without sex-ed.

[–] Snowclone@lemmy.world 21 points 4 months ago

You may think you're making a fun point, but teenage girls don't get pregnant just by showing their midriff and the occasional bra strap, typically a teenage boy is equally participating in the pregnancy. We're pregnant make a lot more sense than She's pregnant, and I'm just window dressing. Bobbert raised morons who couldn't or wouldn't wear a condom, I know a fair amount of guys my age (40s) that don't have a single kid, it's not impossible. They weren't geniuses, they just wore condoms.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 36 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Teen pregnancy is the point.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

So much of the current White Replacement hysteria revolves around white woman not having enough babies.

Can't be overstated how that plays into a conservative hatred for sex ed

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 5 points 4 months ago

Yup, as far as they're concerned white girls need to become breeding slaves to save the so-called white race.

It reeks of sexual pathology.

[–] Pretzilla@lemmy.world 30 points 4 months ago

She advocates for kids in the audience getting in person sex ed

[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 19 points 4 months ago

Makes sense. The irony is strong.

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 15 points 4 months ago

She just keeps getting dumber. Alzheimers might be an improvement

[–] friek@sh.itjust.works 14 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Betelgeuse Betelgeuse Betelgeuse!

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] neidu2@feddit.nl 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Which is short for "yoU'Re Sexually Assaulting a Minor (by giving handjobs in front of them)"

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Legend has it that if you say it three times and you are a constituent, Beetlebert shows up to give out a handy. If you finish up by yelling "oh $DEITY", it's considered both biblical AND Constitutional, since she thinks the separation of the two is a liberal fiction.

[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago

What does this mean?

[–] asteriskeverything@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago (2 children)

She looks ready for the 4th of July pie eating contest!!

[–] Railing5132@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Every time I see a picture of her, my brain immediately says: "howler monkey."

[–] humorlessrepost@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

Same thought process as people who were beat with belts and “turned out fine”.