this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2024
54 points (93.5% liked)

movies

1538 readers
66 users here now

Warning: If the community is empty, make sure you have "English" selected in your languages in your account settings.

🔎 Find discussion threads

A community focused on discussions on movies. Besides usual movie news, the following threads are welcome

Related communities:

Show communities:

Discussion communities:

RULES

Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title’s subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown.

2024 discussion threads

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

This week, a new Russell Crowe movie is released. The film concerns a demon that comes to inhabit a person, and the struggles of a priest to cast the demon out. You might have seen its poster, in which Russell Crowe wears a dog collar and clutches a crucifix.

If that sounds familiar, it might be because it has only been a matter of months since the last time that Russell Crowe starred in a film about a demon that comes to inhabit a person, and the struggles of a priest to cast the demon out, that had a poster in which Russell Crowe wears a dog collar and clutches a crucifix. That film was The Pope’s Exorcist. This new one is called The Exorcism. Do keep up.

If you think it’s slightly inexplicable, to the point of outright derangement, for Russell Crowe to make two films about the same thing, with more or less the same title, where he pretty much wears the same costume, and the poster for each of them uses the same font, then you might have a point. This sort of thing just hasn’t happened in recent memory.

...

Even Nicolas Cage, in the midst of his prolific “Look, I’ll make any film you give me” stage, didn’t make two films as identical as The Exorcism and The Pope’s Exorcist. Even when he made two different films about two different men who can both see slightly into the future and use their skill to stop two different ends of the world (Next and Knowing), he had the good sense to give a couple of years between the two.

...

So, had it not been for Covid, there could have been four whole years between Russell Crowe’s two exorcist films. Had that been the case, barely anyone would have noticed. And maybe, just maybe, Crowe is slightly a victim of his own success here. This is just a punt, but you get the feeling that The Exorcism has gone out of its way to ape the publicity material of The Pope’s Exorcist because it wants to ride the latter’s coat-tails a little. Maybe this is all just an unlucky coincidence.

Either way, what’s done is done. Whatever the circumstances that led to this event, it looks to all the world as if Russell Crowe wants to pump out a relentless stream of identical exorcism movies until the end of time. So now it’s time for him to strike while the iron is hot. By my calculations, he has just 14 months to film and release the concluding part of what has the potential to be one of the weirdest unofficial trilogies of all time. Exorcists in Space, anyone?

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 23 points 3 months ago

Money? I bet it's money.

[–] DashboTreeFrog@discuss.online 14 points 3 months ago

Maybe a hot take, but I liked The Pope's Exorcist, hit all the right classic-supernatural-horror buttons for me. Didn't know about this newer movie but now I wanna watch it

[–] Poiar@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 months ago

Next and Knowing have two very different mechanics and stakes, not to mention different stories. How the article puts these next to each other as similar movies is grasping at straws

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 4 points 3 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Imagine if right after Timothée Chalamet starred in Dune, he rushed off and made another completely unrelated sci-fi movie about a worm-loving messiah figure called The Duning, or if Ryan Gosling and Emily Blunt commemorated their last day of filming on the set of The Fall Guy by signing up for an exactly identical action comedy called Here Comes Mr Whoopsie.

Even when he made two different films about two different men who can both see slightly into the future and use their skill to stop two different ends of the world (Next and Knowing), he had the good sense to give a couple of years between the two.

At some point, we can safely assume that Russell Crowe put on a dog collar, held a crucifix, yelled at a demon and felt such a serene sense of calm wash over him that he decided this would be his entire career from now on.

Sure, Crowe is currently experiencing a Cage-like increased workrate, which means that two of his films and one of his TV shows were released between The Pope’s Exorcist last year and The Exorcism this week.

The Pope’s Exorcist made its budget back four-and-a-half times over, and spent more than a week as the most-watched film on Netflix.

Whatever the circumstances that led to this event, it looks to all the world as if Russell Crowe wants to pump out a relentless stream of identical exorcism movies until the end of time.


The original article contains 803 words, the summary contains 245 words. Saved 69%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Because he loves making a face that goes like this:

[–] Emperor 3 points 3 months ago

And we love him doing it.

[–] then_three_more@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

💷💷💷💷💷💷💷

[–] DrGiltspur@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

When I first heard of The Exorcism starting Russell Crowe, my first thought was "oh, is the sequel to The Pope's Exorcist out already?", which I assume is what the marketing team for The Exorcism were banking on.

On the subject of Pope's Exorcist sequels - they do need to get a move on given that they apparently need to make 199 of them...

[–] bitchkat@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Perhaps he's in his Steven Segall phase?

[–] dumbass@leminal.space 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Because its the only way for him to get an article written about him.

[–] damnthefilibuster@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Nah dude. He could’ve gone the usual powerful man route of molesting someone weaker or susceptible… to get an article.

[–] Emperor 1 points 3 months ago

Exorception