this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2024
415 points (99.8% liked)

News

23275 readers
3446 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Five people were killed in the attack on the LGBTQ bar.

The shooter who killed five and injured over a dozen more at an LGBTQ nightclub in Colorado Springs, Colorado, in 2022 accepted a plea deal Tuesday in connection with federal hate crimes charges and was given 55 concurrent life sentences.

Anderson Lee Aldrich pleaded guilty to each of the 74 charges of violating provisions of the Matthew Shepard And James Byrd, Jr., Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2009 as well as gun crimes in the Club Q shooting. Aldrich initially pleaded not guilty.

United States District Judge Charlotte N. Sweeney accepted the plea agreement, sentencing Aldrich to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole, to be followed by a 190-year sentence of imprisonment.

all 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] half_built_pyramids@lemmy.world 122 points 4 months ago (1 children)

This is the guy who's dad -- upon hearing that his son shot up a gay club -- immediately thought that his son might be gay and was worried about that, but then was relieved that the son had only killed gays.

[–] tyler@programming.dev 14 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You have a link? I don’t remember reading about that.

[–] Evkob@lemmy.ca 58 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (4 children)

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/nov/24/colorado-springs-shooting-father-interview

In a series of interviews, Aaron Brink told San Diego’s CBS8 that when he first received a telephone call from his child’s public defender, his first reaction was to question why his child was in the club.

“And then I go on to find out it’s a gay bar. I said, ‘God, is he gay?’ I got scared, ‘Shit, is he gay?’ And he’s not gay, so I said, ‘Phew …’”

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 36 points 4 months ago

I thought, surely this is out of context right? the next quote:

Brink, a mixed martial arts coach, told CBS8 that he had taught his child to fight, saying he had offered praise “for violent behavior really early. I told him it works. It is instant and you’ll get immediate results.”

Took my daughter to Inside Out 2 the other day. I really appreciate all these films and shows that put such an emphasis on feelings and kindness.

I feel so bad for the children out there with such shitty parents. The Oxford shooter's parents come to mind.

[–] metallic_substance@lemmy.world 30 points 4 months ago

Wow, what a total piece of shit. A small glimpse into the kind of father that raises a hateful, murderous monster

[–] Tyfud@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

And the cycle repeats, again and again, until there's nobody left

[–] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago

I kid you not, the dad has been on the show Intervention for meth addiction, Divorce court as a result of his continued meth addiction, and does gay porn to pay for his meth addiction. He's enormously homophobic, but he'll do gay sex for drugs.

I don't know whether to hate him, or pity him. He must hate himself quite severely.

[–] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 36 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Good. This was an unconscionable crime and the defendant has not demonstrated significant contrition (the allocution phase of the plea agreement must have been interesting); however, capital punishment is barbaric and has no place in society.

[–] Steve@startrek.website 17 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I think people sentenced to life in prison should have a right to choose execution instead.

[–] suchwin@lemmy.world 15 points 4 months ago (1 children)

This is an interesting point I haven't seen before. I think I agree, but only after suicide for medical patients is legal. And also, what about people not in a life sentence (whether a shorter sentence or someone not incarcerated)? Should they have any legal outlet?

Is there a difference between wanting to kill yourself and not wanting to live through a life sentence?

[–] notabot@lemm.ee 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

This is an approach to life sentences I've considered before; I would suggest the prisoner could only petition for execution after being incarcerated for a significant period (20 years or so maybe?) and having exhausted all possible legal appeals. The delay is there to ensure it's not a decision taken in desperation and haste. By that point, if any new evidence to exonerate them is going to turn up, it probably has, although I acknowledge that's not always the case.

I'm not sure I'd equate it to voluntary euthenasia as the prisoner isn't leaving jail alive either way. On the other hand, I can see why linking the two makes sense too.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I would suggest the prisoner could only petition for execution after being incarcerated for a significant period (20 years or so maybe?) and having exhausted all possible legal appeals.

And having to have lived with the consequences of their actions for a signifigant period of time.

No taking "the easy way out" of their punishment.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago

Might have to start revisiting capital punishment if governors/presidents continue to use sell pardons.

[–] Kalkaline@leminal.space 32 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Good, may he live a long, miserable life in prison.

[–] cannibalkitteh@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Personally, I'd rather he reflect and better himself. I'm not entirely comfortable wishing suffering and misery on someone.

[–] FauxReal@sh.itjust.works 16 points 4 months ago

If only our justice system was about rehabilitation and making amends instead of about vengful punishment that ends up harboring a cycle of abuse that finds its way back into society.

[–] Kalkaline@leminal.space 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You're a better person than me.

[–] cannibalkitteh@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 4 months ago

Honestly, I think I'm just fatigued. Retribution isn't going to bring back the dead or curb hate crimes in the future. Ultimately, I hope those that are guests of the carceral system are treated well because they're being made to cede their freedom to the state.

It’s times like these I can kinda understand why pillories have been a thing.

[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Federal... Fuck that means pardonable

[–] BuckyVanBuren@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Federal and State are both pardonable, it is just different entities.

Federal means no parole.

[–] gramie@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 months ago

My guess is, the concern is thinking that if Donald Trump is re-elected, he would pardon this guy.

[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 months ago

Oh that's true

[–] FauxReal@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 months ago

It's also a lot rougher place to be.

[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 3 points 4 months ago

So does state if the Governor is inclined. But with both having life+ sentences there's little chance he goes anywhere.

[–] wildcardology@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Why the plea deal? Was the case against him not strong enough?

[–] numberfour002@lemmy.world 17 points 4 months ago

It saves the government and courts (and by extension tax payers) a whole lot of time and money. There's no need for a normal trial and all the extra crap that comes of that (like appeals). It also removes/reduces the risk(s) of a death penalty sentence (much more expensive than a life sentence), further trauma for the victims as well as their friends and families, and avoids the extremely unlikely but still possible chance that the accused is found not guilty or uses some other legal maneuver to avoid real consequences.

[–] homura1650@lemm.ee 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Life in prison without the possibility of parole, plus 190 years, and the defendent waves almost all of his appeal rights. All of that without needing to go through the efforst, expense, and trauma of a trial. The prosecutors were only able to get this deal because the case against them was so strong.