this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2024
615 points (97.7% liked)

politics

19089 readers
4313 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

One in three Republican voters would have preferred a different candidate to Donald Trump for the upcoming presidential election.

In March, the former president won enough primary races to secure the Republican nomination in the 2024 presidential election.

However, according to a survey of 1,003 Americans by Canadian polling firm Leger, Trump does not command the full support of his base and 33 percent of this demographic would have preferred another politician. Meanwhile, this proportion is higher (47 percent) among Republican voters aged 18 to 34 years old.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RedWeasel@lemmy.world 245 points 5 months ago (4 children)

3 out of 3 will probably vote for trump in the general election.

[–] half_fiction@lemmy.dbzer0.com 90 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Yup, exactly. That's the question that actually matters. Tons of Republicans were very vocally against Trump in 2016 too, but fell in line as soon as he was named their official candidate. The Republican Party is great at unifying around candidates and messaging when it counts (probably one of their only legitimate strengths.)

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 45 points 5 months ago (52 children)

Democrats fall in love. Republicans fall in line.

The problem with Democrats is that because it's a big tent, it's harder to coalesce around one or two issues. Some Democrats really care about the environment and won't come out to vote unless the candidate says they'll do right by it. Other Democrats care about prison reform and won't vote for a candidate that has a history of supporting laws that put more people into prison.

When the Republican platform is "At least we're not liberals", it's much easier to get your people out to vote.

load more comments (52 replies)
[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 7 points 5 months ago

Loyalty is their core attribute, like hand-wringing and second-guessing is for Democrats.

[–] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 17 points 5 months ago (1 children)

There was just another poll that said only 10% of Republican voters WONT vote for trump.

So that means 23% of Republican voters dont want trump but still will vote for him.

That also means 2/3 want him flat out.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

As someone who's a registered Democrat who doesn't want to vote for Biden but will still vote for him, I feel their pain.

[–] match@pawb.social 17 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Nobody changes how they vote, but turnout might be more depressed among Republicans, in which case maybe only 1 in 3 will for for trump

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] jonne@infosec.pub 12 points 5 months ago

Yep, even if he ends up in prison by some miracle.

[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 56 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Oh NOW they think that. It took until NOW to figure it out.

[–] CluelessLemmyng@lemmy.sdf.org 34 points 5 months ago (1 children)

If they're still voting for him, being non preferred isn't exactly a damning opinion.

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

Party over country

[–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 52 points 5 months ago (3 children)

They will still vote for him. They're Republicans for a reason.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Guy_Fieris_Hair@lemmy.world 47 points 5 months ago

Better headline: 2 out of 3 Republicans (the party of "Law and Order") support a candidate convicted of 34 felonies. And 3 out of 3 will still vote for him in the general election.

The original headline is just them saying I wish there was something better, but we got what we got. Which is the same thing I am saying on the left.

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 43 points 5 months ago

Doesn't matter. Get out and vote.

[–] cultsuperstar@lemmy.world 34 points 5 months ago (2 children)

They'll vote for him anyway.

[–] BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works 14 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Some will, but some will also just not feel as engaged and stay home.

Real question is, how large a percentage of potential Trump voters will be demotivated enough to stay home, vs how many potential Biden voters are being turned off by his age and ball-less stance on the war crimes in Gaza.

[–] KISSmyOSFeddit@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

Real question is, how will around 2000 people in the midwest vote? Cause that's what usually decides the outcome.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mightyfoolish@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)

I really think Biden is secretly more popular with Republicans than individual Republicans let on. He hasn't spoken much on abortion and queer support (kind of like it belongs in the background unseen and then we will tolerate it mentality), he wants to lock down the US-Mexico border more, and is very Zionist. He's honestly a good fit for the Republicans before Trump "consolidated" the Republicans under a[n even] crazier branch of conservatism.

load more comments (3 replies)

In March, the former president won enough primary races to secure the Republican nomination in the 2024 presidential election.

However, according to a survey of 1,003 Americans by Canadian polling firm Leger, Trump does not command the full support of his base and 33 percent of this demographic would have preferred another politician.

Another way of writing that 33 percent prefer another politician is that 67 percent prefer Trump. Last I checked, 67 percent support is enough to secure the Republican nomination.

Meanwhile, this proportion is higher (47 percent) among Republican voters aged 18 to 34 years old.

Again, another way of writing this is that 53 percent of Republican voters aged 18 to 34 years old support Trump. I'll double check my arithmetic, but even this seems to be enough to win primaries.

With a title like "One in three Republicans now think Donald Trump was wrong candidate choice," I would expect to see a poll which showed that fewer than "One in three Republicans" used to "think Donald Trump was wrong candidate choice." That seems like a straightforward way to make the point this article is trying to make. Yet none is provided. Instead we are treated to some general electorate polling showing some minor fluctuation and some republicans who were already critical of Trump continuing to be critical of Trump.

The centrist will to make the Republicans look better than they are is so powerful.

[–] dQw4w9WgXcQ@lemm.ee 26 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Those numbers are worringly low. I have been assuming that the vocal group, the ones taking to the streets with their little hats and grumpy faces, were a very verbal minority. I'd expect way more than 1/3 to prefer some other candidate. Not great.

[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

I don't know why. These numbers are better than I expected. The GOP has become a cult like organization. Those usually don't tolerate non believers.

[–] Thteven@lemmy.world 22 points 5 months ago

I'm pretty sure 'thinking' never got in the way of them voting for him before.

[–] Matthew_Gasoline@lemmy.world 21 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Something about laying in a bed you made yourself...

[–] ZagamTheVile@lemmy.world 17 points 5 months ago
[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 14 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Maybe, just fucking maybe... enough will attrition off to Libertarian to split the vote.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Not while the libertarian candidate is gay.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago

Vote for biden and get trump going to jail for free!!!

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 13 points 5 months ago

Maybe, but 2/3 is a majority.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Which means 2 out of 3 will gleefully vote for him with visible metaphorical (?) erections; the 1 out of 3 will maybe metaphorically cover up their metaphorical erections with a pillow...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Spitzspot@lemmings.world 11 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The other two will threaten the first.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago (1 children)

How many had their choice made for them before they even had a chance to vote in a primary?

Nikki Haley was the last to drop out on March 6th, when there were still dozens of primaries to go.

I'd love to see a national primary. But people complain... But... but... it's not fair to small candidates who can't run a national campaign...

Yeah, if you can't run a national campaign, you have no business being President either.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

meanwhile two of three republicans can still taste their colons.

when will these people pull their heads out of their asses?

[–] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

But when all the choices are shit, go for the shittiest shit that ever shitted in shitstown.

[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

LOL they'll certainly try another 1/6, but this time the place will be crawling with plainclothes feds, dozens of snipers (visible; even more out of sight), swat, MRAPs, helicopters, etc etc. and it would be dumb to assume they haven't installed more cameras with audio everywhere

[–] Neato@ttrpg.network 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

One guy with a mounted machine gun at the top of the capitol stairs should be enough of a deterrent I would think.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›