Unfortunately the launch is scrubbed.
this post was submitted on 01 Jun 2024
46 points (96.0% liked)
Space
8773 readers
224 users here now
Share & discuss informative content on: Astrophysics, Cosmology, Space Exploration, Planetary Science and Astrobiology.
Rules
- Be respectful and inclusive.
- No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
- Engage in constructive discussions.
- Share relevant content.
- Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
- Use appropriate language and tone.
- Report violations.
- Foster a continuous learning environment.
Picture of the Day
The Busy Center of the Lagoon Nebula
Related Communities
🔭 Science
- !astronomy@mander.xyz
- !curiosityrover@lemmy.world
- !earthscience@mander.xyz
- !esa@feddit.nl
- !nasa@lemmy.world
- !perseverancerover@lemmy.world
- !physics@mander.xyz
- !space@beehaw.org
- !space@lemmy.world
🚀 Engineering
🌌 Art and Photography
Other Cool Links
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Somehow I missed that this was happening today! I just set a timer to tune back in closer to launch time :D
best set it to next year
I wouldn't be surprised if the crew would quit. It must be frightening to fly on this.
Tbf I’d struggle to find a spaceship that isn’t frightening to fly on. And yet these ballsy individuals do it anyway.
Shocking Shocking it is a scrub.
I don't understand the flack over scrubbing a human rated flight. It's like people want it to fail. It's better to be cautious when human spaceflight is involved, yet, we still get comments like this.
I don't look at it as flack so much as just more justification that Starliner, and by extension Boeing, is a failed system and a direct indication of legacy space's inability to compete with the new ideas and ways of development that companies like SpaceX, Rocket Lab, Firefly, etc. are using now.
Boeing talked a lot about how their design and testing processes were inherently better and safer than companies that work through iterative design (like SpaceX). They were given nearly twice the budget ($4.2B) of SpaceX ($2.6B) to develop a similar crewed capsule system. They were expected to have a system up the fastest since their delivery vehicles were already using tested processes and would be essentially coming from previous known effective designs with modern updates.
Yet Starliner's un-crewed test launches so far have had fundamental issues, including a launch that failed to dock to the ISS entirely, and the crewed launch attempts have all run into issues causing scrubs that realistically should have been caught before launch day. They are 6+ years behind schedule on getting a crew into orbit. Meanwhile, the SpaceX Crew Dragon has made 13 crewed flights already. It's taken so long that at least one Starliner trained astronaut was taken from their program, cross-trained on Crew Dragon, and has visited the ISS already before Starliner has even launched their first crew.
The flack isn't about the scrub itself, everyone wants safety, it's about really everything else in the program. This program just shouldn't be having flight scrubs at this point for things other than weather. Especially not something ridiculous like this latest scrub, especially since the rocket it's on is a well-tested mature design. It just makes them look incompetent at this point:
The space agency said the launch was scrubbed "due to the computer ground launch sequencer not loading into the correct operational configuration after proceeding into terminal count."
United Launch Alliance, which manufactures and operates the rockets that launch the spacecraft into orbit, "is working to understand the cause," NASA added.
I didn’t take this as flack, I took this as “boring fucking sucks”
My comment is really focused on the absolute failure of this launch system. There are so many issues it has become a bad joke.