this post was submitted on 23 May 2024
43 points (97.8% liked)

UK Politics

3108 readers
97 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HowManyNimons@lemmy.world 29 points 6 months ago

All those "urgency" sessions bullying the Lords into signing off on his reality-bending laws, making us all look like a bunch of complete fuckwits on a world stage that still associates Britain with Empirical cruelty, tens of billions of pounds given to the oppressive homophobic government of Rwanda, thousands of asylum seekers traumatized, and what for? A bribe for an election he knows he'll lose. What a pathetic cunt.

[–] thehatfox@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Hopefully that’s the end of the Rwanda policy for good then. I’m a bit surprised he didn’t try to ram it through before calling the election, he seemed to be staking so much on it.

But now they can use it a campaign point for ”stopping the boats” instead - safe in the knowledge they’ll now not have to see it through to the end.

[–] HowManyNimons@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Hopefully its ignoble failure will dissuade other countries from trying similar schemes. I'm pretty tired of the UK being the testing ground for terrible ideas.

[–] Tagger@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Get out and vote on July 4th, then. Don't be complacent, don't let the Tory's back in.

[–] HowManyNimons@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

That's the plan! 😀

[–] steeznson@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

To be fair it was Australia that pioneered this particular idea. Then Israel copied them. I think we're the third country to try a scheme like this.

[–] Flax_vert 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] steeznson@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah, their scheme was/is harsher than the Rwanda one, too. I think there are still people being held somewhere in Papa New Guniea who arrived by boat in Australia over a decade ago.

[–] Flax_vert 2 points 6 months ago
[–] Hossenfeffer 2 points 6 months ago

I mean you could argue we (Brits) did it first by shipping people off to Australia as a deterrent.

[–] Mrkawfee 8 points 6 months ago

Sunak is a joke. He's probably working out his notice for his California tech job.

[–] maculata@aussie.zone 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

‘Shelves’? As in ‘shoving it up into his anal cavity’?

Pity. Stopping people smoking would be a good thing.

[–] Flax_vert -2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Why are they shelving the smoking policies? Actually the government doing something right for once

[–] HumanPenguin 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Guess. But he has a lot of tory opposition. As they consider it a indevidual freedom issue.

Going into an election having relied on the opposition parties to support you. Because the party you lead can't be convinced to vote for you policies.

Looks bad. So he likely dud not bother to risk it.

[–] Flax_vert 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Would be good for Labour to steal the policy

[–] HumanPenguin 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Not so sure. Indeviduals right to do stupid shir. Tends to be an issue on the lefr as well.

While labour as a party has an authoritarian history. Many voters automatically reject policies like this.

If you look up old vids from these times.

When we introduced drink driving laws.

Seat belt laws.

Smoking in public places.

You will be stunned by how vocal people were about overreach.

While I agree with the idea. I do not think it would evere be a vote winner overall. Labour is more likly to lose votes fr folks thinking they are returning to nanny state ideals.