this post was submitted on 20 May 2024
206 points (96.4% liked)

Programmer Humor

32453 readers
867 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml
cat_programmer@lemmy.ml
206
Maybe some ALGOL 58 while we're at it too. (lemmy.cringecollective.io)
submitted 5 months ago by listless@lemmy.cringecollective.io to c/programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
15 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.cringecollective.io/post/9716

Maybe some ALGOL 58 while we're at it too.

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mesamunefire@lemmy.world 43 points 5 months ago (3 children)

COBOL is actually not that bad. It can work with SQL, it can have unit testing/integration testing. It can even go on the web (LOL).

But in all seriousness, the bad part about COBOL is lack of context. Most code that is in COBOL has not been touched in decades. And no one is willing to modify because of serous consequences (AKA job ruining errors) that can occur.

I worked with it in insurance and transportation. In both cases, the COBOL was actually pretty solid...but we didnt know WHY we were doing the operations.

[–] cerement@slrpnk.net 16 points 5 months ago (3 children)

the old languages still have their fans – and COBOL, Fortran, Ada, and Lisp are still holding strong in their respective niches

[–] someacnt_@lemmy.world 22 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Lisp has always been the future >.>

[–] listless@lemmy.cringecollective.io 15 points 5 months ago

And tomorrow is always just a day away.

[–] Deebster@programming.dev 14 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Lisp variants like Clojure are being used for new projects (e.g. Logseq) but I'd be surprised to hear of anyone choosing COBOL for a greenfield project.

[–] mesamunefire@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Yeah the only reason someone should learn COBOL is job security and potentially making a living moving things over. No reason to start a project in the lang. You can make flat files into ODBCs nowadays.

I suppose the ability to be left alone because everyone is afraid the COBOL person leaves and the company goes under is a good reason :)

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I took a principles of programming languages course a while back and got to touch on a lot of these old languages. My professor had huge hard-on for Lisp. Don't get me wrong. The simplicity of the language is admirable. But reading and parsing that shit gave me headaches. No me gusta.

[–] cerement@slrpnk.net 6 points 5 months ago

I think I was the reverse, I found it easier wrapping my mind around Scheme than C …

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 months ago

But didn't they have to retrofit structured programming into COBOL? As in if-else, loops etc. didn't exist in COBOL originally, it was all just GOTO.

I guess, what I'm asking is: Does "not that bad" mean still pretty awful, but perhaps not as awful as one would expect for its age...?

[–] cerement@slrpnk.net 23 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Ada sitting at #22

EDIT: COBOL community adopting a dinosaur for the language’s logo

[–] lambdabeta@lemmy.ca 13 points 5 months ago

I still use Ada daily for my personal projects after having used it at work. I find it compliments my thinking patterns well. My only gripe with it is that they ate too much of their own dog food at AdaCore and now it can be hard to install Ada and gprbuild (due to a circular dependency). Plus gprc stole libgpr and broke some stuff too.

[–] micka190@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

> Thinking the TIOBE Index is worth anything beyond the 2000s.

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I wonder, if this is another effect of LLMs. Maybe it's just really easy and lucrative to generate+sell books for these old languages.

[–] mesamunefire@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Most of the COBOL material never made it into the internet. Like the actual instruction manuals for the languages. Also a vast majority that do have it on the internet have it under paywall. I notice that anything that is under paywall, the LLMs suddenly dont do as well. I think its because they only train them on the "open" internet.