And I'm sure the company responsible will be held to account, won't they? Won't they??
this post was submitted on 08 May 2024
32 points (100.0% liked)
UK Nature and Environment
391 readers
17 users here now
General Instance Rules:
- No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia or xenophobia.
- No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies.
- No harassment, dogpiling or doxxing of other users.
- Do not share intentionally false or misleading information.
- Do not spam or abuse network features.
Community Specific Rules:
- Keep posts UK-specific. There are other places on Lemmy to post articles which relate to global environmental issues (e.g. slrpnk.net).
- Keep comments in English so that they can be appropriately moderated.
Note: Our temporary logo is from The Wildlife Trusts. We are not officially associated with them.
Our autumn banner is a shot of maple leaves by Hossenfeffer.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Is it not flooding that is the responsible party here?
No, it's the privatised sewage companies that have cut costs to the point their infrastructure is crumbling
This is the best summary I could come up with:
People are being urged not to forage wild garlic due to a "serious risk" of E. coli contamination.
Marlborough Town Council in Wiltshire has issued the urgent notice for areas near a tributary of the River Kennet, including St George's Preshute.
Nearby Coopers Meadow flooded with "a significant amount of human waste" after sewers overflowed on 5 January.
"Plants eaten raw should be discarded too, and it is prudent to avoid growing salads and other uncooked crops for two years in case disease spores remain in the soil," a spokesperson from the charity added.
A Marlborough Town Council spokesperson said frequent foraging in the area has caused a "large, unsightly, bare patch" to form.
"With that comes a responsibility to abide by any signs or bylaws, as well as to leave the meadow as you find it for the enjoyment of the whole community and to protect our precious environment and biodiversity."
The original article contains 324 words, the summary contains 152 words. Saved 53%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!