this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2024
38 points (100.0% liked)

fashion

385 readers
1 users here now

** DO NOT SELF-DOXX **

If you need to fit-check please try hard not to self-doxx or include personal identifying information while hexbear redacts meta data you must take effort to obscure your identity. Images or posts that are self-doxxing will be removed.

No Price Checks No Authentication Checks

Be kind and only offer constructive criticism when explicitly asked for it.

Home to the "Fit of the day" and "Fit check Friday"

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Photo caption: "Jennifer Lopez out in Los Angeles in wool cargo pants."

Are We All Really Supposed to Wear Cargo Pants? - NYT

A reader tries to square the style’s enduring appeal with her own reluctance to wear them.

Can you please explain cargo pants (and shorts)? They are clearly enduringly popular for men and women, but the pockets seem neither functional nor flattering. What am I missing, and what is the best way to wear them? — Patti, Boulder, Colo.

Once upon a time cargo pants, otherwise known as “the military’s greatest fashion contribution,” were created to fulfill a very specific function: allowing soldiers to carry crucial tools (or cargo). Invented by the British military in 1938 as part of the new Battle Dress Uniform, cargo pants included a field dressing pocket on the side of the right hip for emergency first aid and a map pocket just above the left knee for navigation.

They quickly migrated into the general population, and at this point I think it’s pretty safe to say, cargo pants can no longer be classified as a trend. They have become a wardrobe basic, like the white shirt or the little black dress. No matter what your gender.

Think of them as “a more chic alternative to your classic cotton pants,” said Hillary Taymour of Collina Strada, whose cargo pants are worn by Travis Kelce and Gina Gershon. “Comfortable enough for the workplace and fancy enough for a cocktail hour.”

Cargo pants received some initial criticism when unveiled. (Reportedly one British officer announced, “I’m not going to die dressed like a third-rate chauffeur.”) But it was only a matter of time before the fashion world, which loves to co-opt uniforms of all kinds, discovered them — especially when they became the uniform of the antiwar movement of the 1960s and from there made their way into the rock star wardrobe.

All that semiology, contained in a pair of trousers! Who could resist? They represented utilitarianism, rebellion, war, peace, masculinity, subversion, D.I.Y. practicality. Yves Saint Laurent was arguably the first designer to give cargo pants the high-fashion treatment, when he included a version in his Saharienne collection of 1968. Since then, it’s hard to think of a single label that hasn’t flirted with the style — on all ends of the fashion spectrum. Though they cycle up and down in popularity (big in the 1990s and noughties, less ubiquitous in the 2010s), they never disappear entirely. And at the moment they are having another major … well, moment.

A brief list of the brands that included cargo pants in recent offerings includes Dries Van Noten, Proenza Schouler, Mango, Cos, JW Anderson, Reformation, Valentino and Uniqlo. Vogue called them a “nonnegotiable for spring.” They come high-waist, low-waist and in all sorts of materials: cotton, canvas, velvet, satin.

There are cargo pants for pretty much everyone, and at this point they have become so denatured, so far removed from their point of origin, that the question of what you may be saying with your cargo pants — whether you are pro-military or not — is essentially moot.

Ms. Taymour recommends wearing cargos with a blazer or a button-up shirt, which makes them look less workwear, more debonair. Christopher John Rogers, who showed silk satin cargo pants on his runway under long button-up shirts left open from the waist down to create a quasi-train (and who lives in his own pair), suggested “wearing them low-slung with an oversize button-down and an elevated shoe, or high-waist and cinched with a belt and a contoured something on top.”

As for the pockets, Ms. Taymour suggests you think of them less as places to store stuff, as they once were intended, and more as architectural elements or “an accessory to your outfit.” The only cargo they should really be carrying, after all, is attitude.

all 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] EmoThugInMyPhase@hexbear.net 24 points 6 months ago (3 children)

I think any pants that's touching the ground is terrible. But cargoes are good. I don't want to stuff my keys and wallet and headphones all in the same pocket.

but the pockets seem neither functional

Where are these people shopping for pants? Lmao. This isn't like suits where the pockets are all fake

[–] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 5 points 6 months ago

I think any pants that's touching the ground is terrible.

Related - Somebody needs to tell Drake that waaaaay too much drip can cause ya 2 slip. - Hexbear

[–] LaGG_3@hexbear.net 3 points 6 months ago

Where are these people shopping for pants? Lmao. This isn't like suits where the pockets are all fake

You know those are just sewn shut, right? You can pop them open and take a trip to pocket town.

[–] keepcarrot@hexbear.net 17 points 6 months ago (1 children)

As for the pockets, Ms. Taymour suggests you think of them less as places to store stuff, as they once were intended

What? No, put stuff in them. Sunglasses. Latex gloves. Steel tape. Phone. Anything you might use while wearing the pants.

[–] Nakoichi@hexbear.net 7 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I could fit at least an entire 6 pack in those pants.

[–] keepcarrot@hexbear.net 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I feel like there's an easy dig at your level of fitness here, but I'm not going to take it. Also, same

[–] Nakoichi@hexbear.net 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

funny enough despite being a g*mer I am actually pretty fit. Lifetime of manual labor will do that.

I also look real cool in a duster.

I can also fit an entire 6 pack in the pockets of that jacket.

[–] heatenconsumerist@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 months ago

Almost enough room to fit the last 2 of your brain cells ;)

[–] GinAndJuche@hexbear.net 17 points 6 months ago

The practicality is unmatched, especially the ones that can zip off into shorts for summer.

[–] jwsmrz@hexbear.net 13 points 6 months ago

cargo pants are good because they have nice pockets and the form lends itself to be flattering to trans fem people (hardcore big pants / small top mode)

[–] Dolores@hexbear.net 9 points 6 months ago

if god wanted us to have a million pockets in our pants he wouldn't have made purses

[–] PbSO4@hexbear.net 8 points 6 months ago

As for the pockets, Ms. Taymour suggests you think of them less as places to store stuff, as they once were intended, and more as architectural elements or “an accessory to your outfit.”

Appalling that she would reduce the noble cargo pocket to mere greebling.

[–] Sickos@hexbear.net 8 points 6 months ago

More pockets more gooder

[–] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 8 points 6 months ago (3 children)

In other news...

[Her] cargo pants are worn by Travis Kelce and Gina Gershon.

I did a double take. I confused the actress Gina Gershon with Gina Gerson and I thought that the New York Times name dropped a porn star.

[–] AlicePraxis@hexbear.net 8 points 6 months ago

lmao. well, they're both very talented women in their respective fields

guess which one is in a movie called "Bound" - it's probably not the one you're thinking of!

[–] ashinadash@hexbear.net 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Do they make my ass look good? If no, not interested.

[–] Dessa@hexbear.net 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

There are good ass-pants of the cargo variety

[–] ashinadash@hexbear.net 3 points 6 months ago

I must reconsider my choice of trousers, maybe I can have both after all...

[–] TheLastHero@hexbear.net 6 points 6 months ago

When I wore them daily I loved them but my peers most definitely did not. I think I am what fashion executives know as a "trend killer" grillman

[–] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 6 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Black or Grey cargos in a futuristic street cut is my go-to, shit goes with almost anything, especially tank tops if you work out

Also it makes your butt look great

[–] Alaskaball@hexbear.net 4 points 6 months ago

Good pants for work. Good pants for life. Boogie shit should get tossed in a fire. Wear actual cargo pants and load them with cargo

[–] Assian_Candor@hexbear.net 4 points 6 months ago

Functional, and dorky as hell

[–] TraumaDumpling@hexbear.net 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

cargo style pants with elastic cuffs at the ends of the legs are my shit, i also prefer high waist and low crotch pants. default normie cargo pants look cool tucked into socks imo

[–] LaGG_3@hexbear.net 2 points 6 months ago

Cargo joggers rock! I've seen a lot of cargo parachute pants around that seem p cool, too

[–] SpiderFarmer@hexbear.net 3 points 6 months ago

The material is comfy as hell and if you're always on your feet, it'a the next best thing to carrying a backpack. Back when I bussed around the city and spent pretty much all my sunlit hours out of the house, I wore cargo pants with a jacket that had a million pockets. Can vouch for.

Also, since I am on my feet all the time, the cargo pants are rather flattering on me.

[–] D61@hexbear.net 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Ya'll worrying about the "cargo" part of the cargo pants and completely ignoring the "wool" and "Los Angeles" parts?

[–] Orcocracy@hexbear.net 2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Cargo pants were great back in the 2000s when you could use them to stow an old Nokia phone, an iPod, and a little point-and-shoot digital camera.

[–] coffeejoe@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 months ago

Reminds me of jncos. Love the old baggy pants style.

[–] Tabitha@hexbear.net 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

yeah and anytime some rando wall/pole bumps into you get a shattered screen? no thx. purses keep winning.

[–] Orcocracy@hexbear.net 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Those old devices didn’t have big easily shattered glass screens like current smartphones do.

[–] Tabitha@hexbear.net 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

yeah they'd have tiny screens that are even easier to break.

[–] Orcocracy@hexbear.net 1 points 6 months ago

Not at all. Many mp3 players didn’t even have screens. Flip phones also didn’t have redundant screens on the outside like they do now. The old devices which did have outside facing screens had hard thick plastic and not glass on their screens. Think about what your phone case is made of - the screens used to be made of that stuff too.

[–] Delphinium@hexbear.net 2 points 6 months ago

I get the practicality of the cargo pocket but I can't stand the feeling of whatever object is in them bumping/rubbing against my leg, therefore I do not purchase pants with cargo pockets. I also think they're ugly

[–] NewLeaf@hexbear.net 2 points 6 months ago

I gave up on caring what other people think about my clothes a long time ago, and you know what? I'm comfortable and my clothing is functional. I'm 35 and I dress like one of those old guys who knows 10 different edible plants in anybody's back yard, and probably has a whole shelf of books dedicated to boats and ships (I actually do have that shelf)

[–] LaGG_3@hexbear.net 1 points 6 months ago

Ms. Taymour recommends wearing cargos with a blazer or a button-up shirt, which makes them look less workwear, more debonair.

Let 👏 workwear 👏 be 👏 workwear 👏