this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2024
-31 points (35.2% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

26933 readers
5265 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I see this way too often here on Lemmy, so I want to post this. Starting a commune is legal in most countries. If you believe in communism, you can found a commune and show us all how great it is.

You lack money? Well, that is literally what stock markets and venture capitalists (capitalism) are created to solve. If you are ready for an IPO, you can sell shares to raise funds. If you are not, you can get Venture Capital in exchange for shares until you are ready for an IPO.

Getting rid of capitalism means you need to find a different way to obtain funding for new ventures. And if your system relies on government charity (some government board handing you money) or taking resources violently, than your system sucks.

Edit: I don't mean that this is a replacement for full communist system. I mean this as a way to get some of the advantages while showing sceptics (like me) it can work and is better. A first step.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DampSquid 57 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yep. That's a real shit post

[–] BackOnMyBS@lemmy.world 16 points 7 months ago

I haven't seen a true shitpost in a while. This one is great lol

[–] KISSmyOSFeddit@lemmy.world 44 points 7 months ago

If you want capitalism, you can start a capital.
If you want sexism, you can start a sex.

Go start a j.

[–] korthrun@lemmy.sdf.org 24 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Ah yes, the core definition of communism: a small farm offering a delusion of independence, which is run within a capitalist system.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 18 points 7 months ago (8 children)

How do you feel about capitalism using violence to maintain itself?

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] zea_64@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 7 months ago (17 children)

Did you just suggest selling the means of production to the bourgeoisie to fund a commune? I... what?

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] femboy_bird@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Well that's 9 iq points I'm never getting back

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] juliebean@lemm.ee 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sidhean@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago (23 children)

overall, i rate this post lmao/10. I wish i thought it was a joke.

Remember, OP: you are not immune to propoganda

load more comments (23 replies)
[–] Seraph@kbin.social 8 points 7 months ago (2 children)

If you want socialism, you start a social.

[–] josefo@leminal.space 1 points 7 months ago

If you want capitalism, you start a capital.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ibaudia@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Giving you a real answer, there are many barriers stopping people from making communes in capitalist nations. There are problems with land and property ownership, financial integration with the capitalist system, taxes, and pressures from anti-communists.

Communist nations, as compared to small local communes, have the advantage when it comes to resource allocation, bureaucracy, and stability due to scale.

Basically, starting a small commune isn't really that practical when you're surrounded by capitalism on all sides, and isn't really what people mean when they talk about a communist society. You can't really have the labor distribution, property, or means of production structures Marxists talk about without a central government at the scale of a nation.

[–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Then does the nation have to be a certain size? There are plenty of micronations in the world. Tuvalu has only around 12,000 people. Does socialism not work in such nations? What about nations with 5 million people? What is the minimum?

As for taxes, what is the issue there? Surely even in communism, you would have to give some portion of production to the government to build infrastructure, run emergency services etc.

Wouldn't financial integration be an issue on international level if it is an issue on inter-company level? (PS: what even is the issue? Is it just being uncompetitive?)

And what is the issue with land and property ownership? Do you mean you can't seize them by force or do you mean it can't be collectively owned? Because I am not a lawyer but I think you can own stuff collectively if you write your contracts and documents correctly.

PS: As for anticommunists interfering with your business, there is actually a law against it.

[–] Ibaudia@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The size of a nation doesn't inherently determine the success of socialism. There have been historical examples of relatively small nations with socialist-inspired policies and economic structures that achieved positive outcomes. I was moreso making the point that nations are different from communes existing within capitalist nations on a variety of levels.

Socialist principles can be applied at different scales. Micronations and small nations can focus on social programs, resource distribution, worker-ownership, etc., regardless of their size.

For taxes, while infrastructure and services are vital, a truly communist system wouldn't depend on taxation in the traditional sense. The idea is for the community to directly produce the goods and services it needs. Again, this runs into conflict when a commune needs to exist in a capitalist framework.

Commune members would contribute their labor and skills, and in return, directly receive what they need. This minimizes the need for a complex tax system as seen in capitalist societies.

Regarding financial integration, a communist system wouldn't rely on traditional capitalist financial models focused on competition. Trade and international exchange would likely be based on cooperation and needs fulfillment instead of pure profit motives.

The challenge lies in managing the complexity of large-scale bartering or exchange systems on an international level, but it's not necessarily impossible. For a small commune in a capitalist nation, though, I can't see that ever happening.

For land, the issue isn't about violently seizing property, but rather transforming the concept of ownership itself. In a communist model, the means of production would be collectively owned by the community.

For the legal stuff: you're right! Legal structures exist to support collective ownership (co-ops, land trusts, etc.). The issue is how those structures interact with a dominant capitalist system and its legal frameworks.

For anticommunist interference, yes it is illegal but when has that ever stopped anyone from harassing their political opponents?

Hope that answers most of your questions!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Siegfried@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

OP, if there was a viable way of making communism work, some one would have done it already. And inb4 if external pressure and/or internal grinding makes your system collapse, then it does not work

[–] MacNCheezus@lemmy.today 3 points 7 months ago

The thing is, it can only ever work if it is chosen voluntarily by every participant, and it requires that everyone be committed to relentlessly work on themselves to root out their own selfishness.

Marx was right in the sense that humans are by nature selfish, but but he was wrong in thinking that selfishness could be abolished by force. What past experiments have shown is that if communism is violently imposed (i.e. via revolution), people will just find other ways to be selfish. For instance, if hoarding wealth is impossible, but everyone’s income is guaranteed no matter what, people will simply try to find ways to work as little as possible.

There IS an example for where communism DOES work BTW, and that’s functional, healthy families. Think about it: since children are naturally weaker than adults, parents do have to work harder in order to provide them with food and education, but as the parents grow older and weaker, the children become stronger and more capable, so they can provide for their parents in their old age. It really is from each according to their ability to each according to their needs.

[–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

I mean, that is kinda my stance.

On the other hand, I am always open to being proven wrong.

[–] atlasraven31@lemm.ee 4 points 7 months ago

I do wonder if a Communist country will just send me money...

[–] josefo@leminal.space 1 points 7 months ago

Putting the shit on shitpost, in a very unique way. I wish this was sarcasm.

[–] therealjcdenton@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 months ago

Larping lol. Communism can't work so people can pretend it does

load more comments
view more: next ›