this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2023
28 points (72.6% liked)

Movies

7224 readers
144 users here now

Lemmy

Welcome to Movies, a community for discussing movies, film news, box office, and more! We want this to be a place for members to feel safe to discuss and share everything they love about movies and movie related things. Please feel free to take part and help our community grow!


Related Communities:

!books@lemmy.world - Discussing books and book-related things.

!comicbooks@lemmy.world - A place to discuss comic books of all types.

!marvelstudios@lemmy.world - LW's home for all things MCU.


While posting and commenting in this community, you must abide by the Lemmy.World Terms of Service: https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

  1. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, or advocating violence will be removed.

  2. Be civil: disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally insult others.

  3. Spam, self promotion, trolling, and bots are not allowed

  4. Shitposts and memes are allowed until they prove to be a problem.

    Regarding spoilers; Please put "(Spoilers)" in the title of your post if you anticipate spoilers, as we do not currently have a spoiler tag available. If your post contains an image that could be considered a spoiler, please mark the thread as NSFW so the image gets blurred. As far as how long to wait until the post is no longer a spoiler, please just use your best judgement. Everyone has a different idea on this, so we don't want to make any hard limits.

    Please use spoiler tags whenever commenting a spoiler in a non-spoiler thread. Most of the Lemmy clients don't support this but we want to get into the habit as clients will be supporting in the future.

Failure to follow these guidelines will result in your post/comment being removed and/or more severe actions. All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. We ask that the users report any comment or post that violates the rules, and to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

From The Playlist's review of last year's "Corner Office":

Because it’s so drab and one-note, “Corner Office” leaves the viewer with lots of time to contemplate the Hamm Conundrum. To wit: in Jon Hamm, we have an actor who seems genetically engineered for movie stardom, a chiseled slab of masculinity who wears a suit like he was born to it, and is a magnificent actor, plus possesses an admirable refusal to take himself too seriously. He seems born of another era, a time when icons like Mitchum and Wayne and Brando filled our screens, which is part of why he was so perfect for “Mad Men.” And perhaps that’s why he has yet to find a single feature film that suits his skills; as my friend, the film critic Sean Burns told me, he’s a man, and now they make movies about boys.

So perhaps that’s why, its many other virtues notwithstanding, it’s so depressing to see Hamm as the sputtering bureaucrat, a role that any one of a hundred other actors could’ve played, in “Top Gun: Maverick,” a movie about a (59-year-old) boy, and that’s certainly why it’s so depressing to see him succumbing to the temptation of actorly dowdiness in “Corner Office.”

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] xantoxis@lemmy.world 64 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I love Jon Hamm and I hope to see him in some big roles, but

he’s a man, and now they make movies about boys

jesus christ dude I think I sprained something rolling my eyes this hard. I'm going to the urgent care and sending you the bill for it

[–] Neato@kbin.social 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah. They call Maverick a boy but then relate John fucking Wayne as a man?! The guy who spent his horrid life pretending to be a cowboy. A profession that never existed? Pathetically out of touch.

[–] roboticide@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

If John Wayne is the standard for being a "man," I'll stay a "boy" thanks.

I think my wife who I don't abuse won't mind it either.

[–] Delphia@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Go watch Tag, Baby Driver and Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt. Whoever wrote that is wrong

[–] laskoune@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

And 30 Rock !

[–] yesterdayshero@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Honestly, he strikes me more like someone whose true passion is comedy, but he's stuck in a leading man's body. He seems to have spent a fair bit of time post Mad Men doing plenty of comedic (or less serious) roles or bits. I'm just happy that he's still getting opportunities and wasn't so typecast after Mad Men that he wasn't getting a shot at much else.

I wonder if that comment would be different if the show was Severance instead of Corner Office. Adam Scott is great in that role, but a big part of it's success is also the team around the show. And that's not easy to come by.

[–] krewjew@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It’s not wrong, I love Hamm for his work in Mad Men but I’ve yet to see him in anything else where he didn’t feel extremely out of place.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Good Omens.

White Christmas

[–] Emperor 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] krewjew@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Great movie. But I think this movie shows both sides of the coin with Jon. Dialog heavy scenes where Jon gets a chance to be level headed and really deliver his lines with potency always work in his favor. Like the cafe scene with Baby and the female lead is outstanding from his part. But practically every scene of him just being the “villain” feel off to me. It might just be that my expectations of him onscreen are too high after Mad Men. I don’t blame Jon at all though, he clearly works incredibly hard in his career. I just feel like the roles he’s played have not given him much of a chance to shine. Like give the guy another leading role for christsakes.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago

It really does work when they lean into the dichotomy. The aesthetic towards uncanny, there has to be something lurking.

[–] krewjew@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Two I haven’t seen yet!

[–] spacedancer@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I thought this was gonna be about his fratboy antics when he was younger. That aside, maybe he just needs that one leading man role that will push him to mainstream stardom. That or maybe he's a character actor stuck in a leading man's body. Actors like Colin Farrell and Ryan Gosling are at their best as character actors instead of playing dashing leading men.

[–] palarith@aussie.zone 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I enjoyed his performance in Fletch. Hope there will be more Hamm/Fletch movies

[–] leave_it_blank@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

He was the reason I gave that movie a chance. I wasn't interested because I thought it was just a remake of the Chevy Chase films.

I'm glad I did, Fletch was surprisingly good!

[–] beefcat@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don’t like this “boys vs. men” rhetoric. It sounds to me like old people complaining that masculinity doesn’t mean the same thing to many millennials and gen z as it did to boomers. It is deliberately diminutive, engineered to be divisive.

[–] freamon@endlesstalk.org -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I last saw Hamm in Maggie Moore(s) - he and Tina Fey seem to be doing John Slattery a favour by starring in it. Nick Mohammed also appears (inexplicitly in the American police, although so was Chris O'Dowd in Bridesmaids to be fair). I only have two types of movie reviews: "I watched to the end" or "I didn't" and Maggie Moore(s) is a Type 2 Review.

Edit: Hey, you can't downvote my comment on my own post. That's not fair (I was planning on using those upvotes for something). Am I not contributing to the discussion? I made the flippin' discussion! Where's all your posts, huh?