this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2024
1049 points (97.9% liked)
People Twitter
5189 readers
2277 users here now
People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.
RULES:
- Mark NSFW content.
- No doxxing people.
- Must be a tweet or similar
- No bullying or international politcs
- Be excellent to each other.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Nice to have a balance though. Some of the Moore and Connery era movies were basically Austin Powers.
We're in a bit of a sticky situation. Nationalism is very unpopular now, and people have a general distrust of our government and its institutions. That is reflected in these movies, where the enemy is actually their own organization, where it would have been a foreign enemy in the past, like an actual enemy of our country. But then the depiction of the government institutions as untrustworthy in so many movies fuels people's distrust of the government to the point where now the only stories that people will believe are where the hero is fighting internal powers. It's a bit of circular reinforcement.
Well it's nice to see Russia doing their part to make foreign superpowers unpopular again.
I'm itching for a James Bond where he's up against the KGB again, and has his full kit of ultra-modern make-believe toys!
The first Kingsman movie was one of the best new Bond film, even if it had some tongue-in-cheek parody elements and openly acknowledged it. Over the top bad guy, fun gadgets, saving the world. Definitely scratches the itch for a Bond film pretty well.
And the KGB is on a rusty bicycle from 1929.
austin powers did to spy movies what blazing saddles did to western/cowboy movies
they had to be grittier or darker to get away from the parodies