this post was submitted on 30 May 2024
2756 points (99.3% liked)

News

23367 readers
3012 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 19 points 5 months ago (4 children)

"Case by case" for political office is so obviously open to corruption you shouldn't bother with it though, and felony definitions are already weaponized as they are between drugs and protest laws.

Hell, for that matter, isn't a public record of convictions already your best version of a case by case system?

Each voter can decide which crime matters to them..

I'm probably more likely to vote for someone that caught a felony for protesting.

[–] AnneBonny@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 months ago

What's the felony charge for protesting called?

[–] Esqplorer@lemmy.zip 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It's not case by case, but crime by crime. It should be decided on a basis of rule of law as to which specific crimes, such as those reflecting character and not just a lapse in judgement.

Trump has many convictions reflecting on his character in this one trial.

[–] zaph@sh.itjust.works -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Problem with that is you can't attack someone's character in court unless they try to use it as a defense so there's no way that's getting into the constitution in our lifetimes.

[–] Esqplorer@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 months ago

You absolutely can reference character. It just isn't itself evidence of other crimes.

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

weaponized

My state has a law on the books specifying Abuse of a Sports Official as a felony. As in, "Hey you, the umpire's a bum."

As you have observed, the situation has gotten quite out of hand.

[–] 3volver@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Practically I think that all felons shouldn't be able to run for office given the nature of the system. Ideally it would be case by case, but yes it would be corrupted and used by those in power to stop people from running. We either need to allow felons to vote and allow felons to run for president, OR do not allow felons to vote and do not allow felons to run for president. Right now the system makes no fucking sense.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

So anyone who is caught with too much weed in a certain state?

Anyone who "resists arrest" at a protest?

No, fuck that. Felons should be able to vote and run for office, unless convicted of treason or insurrection.

Which Trump should be.