this post was submitted on 30 May 2024
197 points (91.2% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35903 readers
1674 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Title

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] deranger@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

“users” is plural and countable so it should be “are” and “fewer”

[–] Dsklnsadog@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You really need to be 'that' guy

[–] deranger@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I was doing this on Reddit 10 years ago, so...

[–] MorrisonMotel6@lemm.ee 0 points 5 months ago

You keep at it, buddy

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Context.

Here it's being used a singular group of things.

Like, a herd of cows is a singular thing made up of lots of individual things.

If you lost 50% of the herd, you wouldn't say you had fewer herd

You'd say you have less of a herd.

But language is what we make it, it's why the rules are blurry

[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

Your argument is supporting the comment you're replying to. "Users" is equivalent to "cows" in your example, not "herd". If you lost 50% of the herd, you'd still have a herd of cows, but you'd have fewer cows, just like there are a lot fewer users in this instance.

Herd is closer to userbase. Lemmy has a userbase; Reddit has a userbase. Lemmy's userbase has a lot fewer users than Reddit's.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago

Both may be correct depending on the speaker. English has exceptions to everything... I learned that from a European.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (2 children)

"users" is a singular group in this context.

[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 6 points 5 months ago

It's not, but even if it was, the original comment would be grammatically incorrect.You wouldn't say "You have a lot less herd". "Less of a herd" would work, "Your herd is a lot smaller" would work better, but it was written originally as though 'users' was a collection of individuals, not a userbase as a singular item.

[–] deranger@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 months ago

"There are a lot fewer users" is the proper grammar. You wouldn't say "There is users online", you'd say "There are users online" because users is plural. "There is a user online" would be singular.

[–] deranger@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Here it's being used a singular group of things

It's not singular, "users" is plural. "A group of users" is singular, but "users" is referring to multiple individuals. The correct verb to use with users is are.

For example, you would be incorrect to say "There is users online", but you could say "There is a group of users online".