this post was submitted on 23 May 2024
4 points (55.9% liked)

Android

28002 readers
314 users here now

DROID DOES

Welcome to the droidymcdroidface-iest, Lemmyest (Lemmiest), test, bestest, phoniest, pluckiest, snarkiest, and spiciest Android community on Lemmy (Do not respond)! Here you can participate in amazing discussions and events relating to all things Android.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules


1. All posts must be relevant to Android devices/operating system.


2. Posts cannot be illegal or NSFW material.


3. No spam, self promotion, or upvote farming. Sources engaging in these behavior will be added to the Blacklist.


4. Non-whitelisted bots will be banned.


5. Engage respectfully: Harassment, flamebaiting, bad faith engagement, or agenda posting will result in your posts being removed. Excessive violations will result in temporary or permanent ban, depending on severity.


6. Memes are not allowed to be posts, but are allowed in the comments.


7. Posts from clickbait sources are heavily discouraged. Please de-clickbait titles if it needs to be submitted.


8. Submission statements of any length composed of your own thoughts inside the post text field are mandatory for any microblog posts, and are optional but recommended for article/image/video posts.


Community Resources:


We are Android girls*,

In our Lemmy.world.

The back is plastic,

It's fantastic.

*Well, not just girls: people of all gender identities are welcomed here.


Our Partner Communities:

!android@lemmy.ml


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GamingChairModel@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Yes but can you prove by evidence that there is no milk in my cup, if I won't let you look inside?

[–] AndrewZabar@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Someone wants a glass of milk :-)

[–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Proving the negative or positive would be equally hard then .

[–] GamingChairModel@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Yes, but an absence of a proof of the positive is itself not proof of the negative, so if we're in the unprovable unknown, we're still back at the point that you can't prove a negative.

[–] AndrewZabar@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Well, if the conditions are such that the positive would be absolutely certain to leave evidence, then the lack of said evidence is good enough. Like, I say it’s not snowing where I live. Absolutely nobody in my town sees so much as a single snowflake. Also, it’s 72° out. Haven’t I proven to a reasonable degree that it’s not snowing where I live?

[–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

we’re still back at the point that you can’t prove a negative.

We were never at the point that you can't prove a negative. That's dumb & wrong.

A woman menstruating proves negative on pregnancy.

The existence of the largest prime was disproven thousands of years ago.