this post was submitted on 17 May 2024
163 points (98.8% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5276 readers
622 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
163
Trump’s promises to oil executives ought to be illegal (wapo.st)
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
18 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

context:

What Trump promised oil CEOs as he asked them to steer $1 billion to his campaign

Donald Trump has pledged to scrap President Biden’s policies on electric vehicles and wind energy, as well as other initiatives opposed by the fossil fuel industry.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] snooggums@midwest.social 26 points 6 months ago (1 children)

As of this post, all of them.

[–] mynachmadarch@kbin.social 6 points 6 months ago (2 children)

He hasn't gotten away with the defamation against E. Jean Caroll I'd argue.

[–] Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

How much has he paid so far?

[–] tristan@aussie.zone 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

He's had to shell out for both to appeal them... The first I believe he put up cash, the second he used properly as a bond

[–] whostosay@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

His donors had to shell out*

[–] snooggums@midwest.social 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Pretty sure that is a civil suit.

[–] Thorry84@feddit.nl 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yeah he got away with the crime and lost the civil suit. Which makes no sense at all.