History

23083 readers

81 users here now

Welcome to c/history! History is written by the posters.

c/history is a comm for discussion about history so feel free to talk and post about articles, books, videos, events or historical figures you find interesting

Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember...we're all comrades here.

Do not post reactionary or imperialist takes (criticism is fine, but don't pull nonsense from whatever chud author is out there).

When sharing historical facts, remember to provide credible souces or citations.

Historical Disinformation will be removed

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

WhoaSlowDownMaurice@hexbear.net

thelastaxolotl@hexbear.net

ZoomeristLeninist@hexbear.net

InsidiousTrackers@hexbear.net

Question about the use of nukes in WW2 (hexbear.net)

submitted 6 months ago by nothx@hexbear.net to c/history@hexbear.net

17 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Was talking to a friend of mine about the use of nukes and I was told about how it was the quicker way to save more lives. I’ve always heard this argument but still always believed that it was an extreme response that could have been avoided.

Am I naive in my thoughts here? What is everyone else’s interpretation of the events leading up to and the decision made to drop both bombs?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Tunnelvision@hexbear.net 28 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The dropping of the bombs had really nothing to do with getting Japan to surrender and everything to do with intimidating the Soviets who were already invading Manchuria. Multiple admirals held beliefs that the use of atomic weaponry was not necessary and that Japan was already on their way to surrendering.

[–] Llituro@hexbear.net 15 points 6 months ago (1 children)

to add, japan was in particular interested in surrendering to the americans to avoid soviet prosecution so long as they could keep hirohito as a figurehead. the us ostensibly made a big fuss about that, so they just had to use the nuke to avoid invading... and then of course let hirohito continue to be the figurehead anyway.

[–] GinAndJuche@hexbear.net 11 points 6 months ago

It was implied above, but adding that preventing Soviet forces getting there first by ending it sooner with mass death was also a part of the point. We can end the war sooner by blowing up entire cities, this means the “reds” cant get there first, glances at the timeline for a ground invasion, we cannot risk a west japan/east japan situation, kill em all.

Imagine a world where NE Japan had decades of being communist. The anime would be so lit.