this post was submitted on 09 May 2024
615 points (94.0% liked)

News

23413 readers
2644 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A recent study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences reveals that across all political and social groups in the United States, there is a strong preference against living near AR-15 rifle owners and neighbors who store guns outside of locked safes. This surprising consensus suggests that when it comes to immediate living environments, Americans’ views on gun control may be less divided than the polarized national debate suggests.

The research was conducted against a backdrop of increasing gun violence and polarization on gun policy in the United States. The United States has over 350 million civilian firearms and gun-related incidents, including accidents and mass shootings, have become a leading cause of death in the country. Despite political divides, the new study aimed to explore whether there’s common ground among Americans in their immediate living environments, focusing on neighborhood preferences related to gun ownership and storage.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Veraxus@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Underlying Cause of Death, 2018-2022, Single Race Results (Persons aged 1-19)
#1 - Firearm

https://wonder.cdc.gov/controller/datarequest/D158;jsessionid=E9C7B23A4CABE7AA0CDEFB26390B

[–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world -1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

Link does not work

PS: Are you including suicides? If so, than maybe it is possible in the 1-19 age group you selected but incredibly misleading and still untrue in general population.

PS2: You can link to the data by clicking save in the top right.

[–] bloodfart@lemmy.ml 0 points 6 months ago

Iirc that dataset does include suicides and accidental discharges.

[–] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 0 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Hey we’re here to move the goalposts, where do you want them?

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

The goalposts have already been massively moved.

The post is about AR-15s. All rifles combined are used less than 3% of firearm homicides, which combined make up approximately 1/3rd of firearm deaths.

By including all firearm deaths in a discussion about AR-15s we're suggesting they're 100 times deadlier than they are.

ARs don't actually have a huge impact. It's why the sunset of the AWB was kinda ignored. Every study of the AWB's impact showed no statistically-significant impact from the AWB, so there wasn't much effort to keep it going at the time.

The guns that are involved in almost all homicides, suicides, and accidents aren't ARs. They're pistols. When the AWB expired, the gun control crowd focused on them almost exclusively. But then around 2009 messaging suddenly changed and ARs were the most evil thing in the universe again.

In 2008, the Supreme Court ruled in DC v Heller that handguns were protected. Suddenly gun control groups had a problem. They couldn't ban handguns without a constitutional amendment, and they needed to justify their existence.

So they changed messaging and started going after ARs bigtime. They created a political climate that drove unhinged crazy people to go buy ARs to spite the Brady Foundation, and the AR became the most popular firearm platform in the country.

Then, wonder of wonders, the most popular gun was used in more crimes.

It's like saying F-150s are more dangerous than Cybertrucks because more F-150s get in wrecks.

[–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

On the whole population where they belong instead of a carefully selected subset.

[–] Ballistic_86@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Yeah, fuck those kids. They went out and bought those weapons! They can kill themselves if they want!

[–] orrk@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I agree, we need to be able to threaten everyone we don't like with execution!

steal something? DEATH SENTENCE. vandalize something? DEATH SENTENCE. made me mad? YUP THAT'S A DOUBLE DEATH SENTENCE.

an armed society is a polite society, because I can just shoot you!

/s. if anyone wasn't able to tell

[–] Ballistic_86@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Hell yeah! That’s why I keep a vial of anthrax on me at all times. Never know when you might need it.

You forgot to mention, pull into my driveway on accident, DEATH SENTENCE, served immediately. I need all citizens of the US to be Judge, Jury, and Executioner to feel safe.

[–] orrk@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

child ringing on doorbell? DEATH SENTENCE.

[–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Oh no, kids are dying. Quickly tell everyone nothing ever happened in Tiananmen Square because spreading misinformation will help apparently.

Surely only people who want kids dead would point out misinformation. /s

[–] Ballistic_86@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

You are a sad nihilist and you have a strange way of arguing your point. Comparing a random person quoting a stat from the internet on a social media post to the CCP covering up Tiananmen is so interesting. It takes what-about-ism to a whole other level. It wasn’t even misinformation, it was just a hastily googled fact from some random person on Lemmy.

Hard to believe you wouldn’t go with the usual, “What about cars? What about being fat?” As if any of that would be relevant to the shocking stats for gun violence deaths of children and young adults.

[–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

... and you have a strange way of arguing your point.

That's the issue, I am not arguing any point other than the main post is misleading. US gun laws are absolutely stupid. You desperately need a reform. I never disagreed with that. Sure, more people die of heart disease but that is much harder to fix than gun laws.

You are just projecting shit onto my comments that was never there and then get confused when I don't disagree in the way you expect.