Is this how ceasefires work?
this post was submitted on 07 May 2024
199 points (100.0% liked)
news
23532 readers
772 users here now
Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.
Rules:
-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --
-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --
-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --
-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --
-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--
-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--
-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --
-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Because these kids grew up in a social context where allahu akbar was treated basically the same as heil hitler (except in the parts of the country where they prefer that), and now they're publicly announcing they don't give a shit and the stigma no longer means anything to them.
Just realized I should have specified: the students I heard if from were quite white, so I read it less as as heartfelt religious sentiment and more as:
1:A heartfelt declaration of allegiance to the enemies of the empire, using the words we were brought up to believe were some kind of magic words that suddenly made you an enemy of the empire. In this context, a rejection of American exceptionalism and the racism that undergirds it.
2: A refutation of the status of the phrase allahu akbar in American pop culture as a punchline, something that denotes the character using it as unserious, undeserving of consideration, and marked for a death that will be played for laughs. An insistence on the common humanity of Muslim people in the face of decades of propaganda saying otherwise.
3: A way to freak out the squares, to rub in to the Mike Johnsons of the world that their most hysterical fears about the youth hating them are coming true.
That's a very clear explanation thank you comrade I completely agree then.
Sorry we had a misunderstanding on the word radicalisation, since where I live we often talk about religious radicalisation in Islam, in the general islamophobe discussion.
No worries