this post was submitted on 05 May 2024
1458 points (98.8% liked)

Political Memes

5501 readers
2003 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Stern@lemmy.world 38 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Would love to hear the followup question, "If the president decides a supreme court justice is a corrupt person..."

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

That was entirely my point I made a couple weeks ago. If they move ahead on that decision, then Biden would be within his rights to have the consenting judges hung and replace them, hanging any members of congress or senators that tried to block the appointments. Then he could ask that court to reconsider the decision, and he would have been immune for these actions that occurred during the hiatus of accountability.

Seems like a fairly straightforward solution.

[–] GoofSchmoofer@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

There is no stopping the justices from putting big caveats around their ruling.

It could be "in this very specific case with this very specific person at this very specific time we agree that the president is immune from prosecution. Any other acts by this or any other president are not included in this ruling."