this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2024
1484 points (98.7% liked)

Work Reform

10054 readers
391 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JackiesFridge@lemmy.world 23 points 7 months ago (4 children)

That's...definitionally not quitting, quiet or otherwise. That's literally doing the work you agreed to do when hired.

[–] Drusas@kbin.run 14 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yes, but when they hired you, they planned to overwork and exploit you. It's not fair that they can't do so!

[–] JackiesFridge@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

Oh well then I feel so bad for them /s

When I started my current job they told me the position was 45 hours/week. For my salary and task load that sounded reasonable. After that 45 I am gone and they respect my boundaries, which was honestly unexpected.

[–] yokonzo@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

I didn't name the thing

[–] Default_Defect@midwest.social 4 points 7 months ago

You understand why its a shitty term then.

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I think "quiet quiting" specifically refers to a sliding of your norms that remain within the outlined KPIs. For example, if you usually respond to requests within the hour and the organizational requirement is within 1 business day, starting to not respond to requests until they've sat for several hours without any actual change to your workload would be very noticeable, but ultimately its still well within the required timeframe

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

that's not quitting