this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2024
604 points (89.0% liked)

Showerthoughts

30044 readers
1258 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. A showerthought should offer a unique perspective on an ordinary part of life.

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. Avoid politics
    • 3.1) NEW RULE as of 5 Nov 2024, trying it out
    • 3.2) Political posts often end up being circle jerks (not offering unique perspective) or enflaming (too much work for mods).
    • 3.3) Try c/politicaldiscussion, volunteer as a mod here, or start your own community.
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Everytime I look at small problems or big global problems, if you follow the money trail, it all leads to some billionaire who is either working towards increasing their wealth or protecting their wealth from decreasing.

Everything from politics, climate change, workers rights, democratic government, technology, land rights, human rights can all be rendered down to people fighting another group of people who defend the rights of a billionaire to keep their wealth or to expand their control.

If humanity got rid of or outlawed the notion of any one individual owning far too much money than they could ever possibly spend in a lifetime, we could free up so much wealth and energy to do other things like save ourselves from climate change.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 30 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Wealth is just one means of power. Destroying all billionaires, while a good step, would not even come close to solving almost every problem in the world.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 8 points 8 months ago

Right now billionaires are a huge bottleneck to global development and those people who actually want to do something about our worlds problems. Getting rid of them won't solve our world's problems ... it will just make our problems easier to solve. Leaving them alone means our problems persist while they actively block everyone else from dealing with the world's problems.

[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

That doesn't even come close to meaning we shouldn't do it.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Didn't say we shouldn't. Explicitly said it was a good step.

[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

my apologies, I completely read past that.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Throughout history power has been used to obtain wealth and comfort. So if you remove the ability to leverage power for wealth, you remove the primary motivator for obtaining power for most people. There are certainly people who want power for the sake of power, but most people want power to obtain comfort.