Greentext

4342 readers

1735 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

Anon is often crazy.
Anon is often depressed.
Anon frequently shares thoughts that are immature, offensive, or incomprehensible.

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Early_To_Risa@sh.itjust.works

767

Anon's brother hates concrete (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 6 months ago by Early_To_Risa@sh.itjust.works to c/greentext@sh.itjust.works

102 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Barbarian@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

I think you may be confusing functionalism with brutalism. In the UK, these two styles were combined but that isn't necessarily true. Brutalist buildings can very much eschew function in order to be more imposing, memorable or unusual.

Functionalism is the style that is all about minimizing the resources used to get the most useful building you possibly can.

[–] exocrinous@startrek.website 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, I know there's impractical brutalist buildings, but those are the big expensive projects, right? The cheap ones are practical as far as I knew

[–] Barbarian@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Yes, any architectural style can be practical, I'm just saying that the style you're actually advocating for is functionalism. I'd recommend doing some reading about it. I think you'd be a fan, considering you already seem to be in favour of all its core precepts.