this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2024
657 points (97.3% liked)

Greentext

4348 readers
1149 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MacNCheezus@lemmy.today 134 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I can’t think of anything more 2024 than openly talking about having sexual intercourse with household objects but censoring the word “retard”.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 7 points 7 months ago (2 children)

funnily enough my (or your) instance filters out the word too

[–] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I switched over from your instance because of the censorship. It's infantilizing to cross out or add asterisks to such words.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 5 points 7 months ago
[–] MacNCheezus@lemmy.today 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Nah that's your instance. It shows up fine when I view it on mine, but when I go on your it does indeed say removed.

[–] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

.world censored the full fag word

[–] MacNCheezus@lemmy.today 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You mean gay? Or homosexual?

And why would they censor that and not “fag”, when the former are also used as neutral descriptions while the latter is almost exclusively used in a derogatory way?

And also, do I even have to point out how ridiculous it is to promote freedom of information while simultaneously selectively censoring certain words? That’s literally Russia levels of hypocrisy right there.

[–] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

No I mean f a g g o t is censored. Which is doubly ironic since fag isn't

[–] MacNCheezus@lemmy.today 5 points 7 months ago

Perhaps because it would upset British folks talking about their cigarettes?