this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2024
37 points (95.1% liked)

United Kingdom

4108 readers
239 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Reports suggest a rise in complaints that stamps bought from legitimate stores are being deemed counterfeit. Anyone who receives a letter with a fake stamp is charged £5 by Royal Mail.

Conservative MP Iain Duncan Smith told BBC Breakfast: "China is behind it."

A Royal Mail spokesman said: "We are working hard to remove counterfeit stamps from circulation."

Consumers are being warned to look out for strange perforations around the edge of a stamp, a shine to the surface or the colour looking off.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] thehatfox@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago (2 children)

All that effort to roll out barcoded stamps was well worth it then.

I wonder if this might be the beginning of the end for stamps. The privatised Royal Mail already wants to reduce or even drop entirely letter carrying in favour of parcels. I could see an inability to combat stop forgery another argument used to advance that, with phasing out stamps a way to discourage sending lettters.

[–] HeartyBeast@kbin.social 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The universal service obligation obliges them to carry stamps. Getting rid of that would require an act of parliament. Good luck getting that through either house

[–] thehatfox@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I would hope that be the case, but I don’t have a lot of faith in it. Royal Mail wants to tear up the USO, because they claim they claim they can only be a viable business without it. The ultimate goal seems to be turning RM into just another commercial parcel courier.

They are being increasingly loud about this, and it wouldn’t surprise me if they eventually bend enough politicians around. The privatised water companies already managed that with the Tories wrapped around their finger.

[–] Ross_audio@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Or they go close to bust and get renationalised.

If Labour are smart about it they'll keep the USO in place and when it's shown the business isn't profitable take the assets back into public hands at a reasonable price.

The key problem with the new stamps is there's no way for someone to check the validity themselves.

It's also just a barcode, so a fake stamp that gets used with that barcode first doesn't get stopped and the legitimate one does.

There have definitely been some batches where the barcodes have leaked.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 2 points 7 months ago

Royal Mail wants to tear up the USO, because they claim they claim they can only be a viable business without it. The ultimate goal seems to be turning RM into just another commercial parcel courier.

I mean, that doesn't sound that unreasonable to me. Electronic communication has done a lot to displace snail mail, and I have a hard time seeing that changing, there being some new use that produces a lot of demand for sending very thin, flat, flexible things. On the other hand, electronic communication doesn't much replace packages. If anything, it maybe increases demand for package delivery, due to stuff like online shopping.

[–] GreatAlbatross 3 points 7 months ago

All that effort to roll out barcoded stamps was well worth it then.

I would assume that the barcodes makes it far easier to find fakes. Unless they're just simple serials, in which case they're a bit boned.