this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2024
861 points (97.0% liked)

Political Memes

5428 readers
2336 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Register to vote: https://vote.gov

Contact your reps:

Senate: https://www.senate.gov/senators/senators-contact.htm?Class=1

House of Representatives: https://contactrepresentatives.org/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Wogi@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

UBI is a bandaid, and not a very good one.

Sure, having more money absolutely makes life easier. I'm not disputing that and no one with any sense would. But it doesn't address the numerous problems it seeks to.

But you touched on the problem, adequate controls are needed. We can do adequate controls without UBI.

The problem with UBI is that when you do big payouts like that, they just become a target for price gouging. Everyone knows there's extra money to be had and they're going to want their cut. Your landlord is going to know exactly how much extra you're making and without rent control there's nothing stopping him from taking it. The best way to prevent that is to force him to compete for tenants.

So wait, why isn't he competing for tenants now?

Additional housing fixes the rent problem. UBI puts a temporary bandaid on it.

Universal healthcare fixes the medical expenses problem, strong unionization fixes the wages problem.

Don't get me wrong I'd love the paycheck, but it isn't the solution people think it is.

[–] cqst@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Universal Basic Income reduced child poverty by 30%.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_tax_credit#United_States

By making the child tax credit non-refundable it is effectively a Negative Income Tax which is a form of UBI.

'Additional housing fixes the rent problem. UBI puts a temporary bandaid on it. Universal healthcare fixes the medical expenses problem, strong unionization fixes the wages problem. Don’t get me wrong I’d love the paycheck, but it isn’t the solution people think it is.'

All of your points misunderstand what the goal of UBI is. By guaranteeing that everyone earns a certain amount of income, the government is garaunteeing a basic standard of living. So a CTC of $3600 means that everyone is guaranteeed an income of at least $3600.

At first, there will be an inital raise in prices as a UBI will likely increases aggregate demand which will increase prices, but eventually prices would stabilize.

Of course, this only helps people with children right now, and there are barriers to filing a tax return in the United States. But the laws could be change to expand the credit, and it's completely possible for the United States to implement return free filing.