this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2024
413 points (95.8% liked)

World News

32315 readers
1055 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

After Israel killed seven aid workers in Gaza, the US says it has not found any incidents of Israel violating international humanitarian law in the past six months. An Al Jazeera probe concluded the World Central Kitchen vehicles were deliberately hit.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 286 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Israel, with US backing, is destroying the concept of international law. It's now clear to everyone that the so-called international rules based order isn't real and that the rules only apply to US enemies like Russia.

I think we're seeing a repeat of the League of Nations.

[–] Drinvictus@discuss.tchncs.de 123 points 7 months ago (1 children)

That and brown people don't count as people.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 81 points 7 months ago (1 children)

That's the bigger one. They're happy to enforce the rules on brown people when they attack brown people, or white people on white people, and all hell is unleashed when it's brown on white, but when it's mostly white Israelis on mostly brown Palestinians you get crickets.

[–] Welt@lazysoci.al 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

And that's why I don't like cricket.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 7 months ago

Eh. It still seems more interesting than baseball, and it's more exotic where I live, which the hipster in me likes.

In case this was actually unclear, there's a media trope of using the sound of crickets (the animal) to emphasis a silence.

[–] Aria@lemmygrad.ml 20 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Only leftists think we score a point when we say 'rules based order' is a farse. It's meant to be a farse, or they'd say international law like everyone else. To the imperial core and liberals, this is obvious and correct.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 25 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The people in charge see it as obvious.

Do you think every dumbass liberal does? No! That's why we raise the contradictions.

[–] Aria@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Do you think every dumbass liberal does?

Yes, they celebrate the asymmetry.

[–] melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

I feel like the core of liberalism is feeling like youre a good person no matter what you do. Like all their evil is the monkey paw version of good things, and then they say they did the good thing.

Like how we did get globalism and free travel, but only for commodities, so (poor) people were locked down and labor was made more fungible because factories but not people were mobile. None of that commie universal kinship/comeraderie shit or the total anarchy of freedom to roam unaccosted by uniformed thugs, that might disrupt the interests of capital.

Liberalism is jacking yourself off with a monkey paw. It doesn't even vibrate, I don't think, but the stroking motion is essential. And if you point out not everyone's got a dick, you get a cookie and a pamphlet about using it as a dildo.

[–] Aria@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 7 months ago

I appreciate you a lot.

[–] catsarebadpeople@sh.itjust.works -2 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You might have missed the point lol

[–] catsarebadpeople@sh.itjust.works -5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

No point taken for sure. I just don't really feel bad that Russia was stopped from genocide in Ukraine even though it's not "fair". The US being able to enable Israel is absolutely deplorable though.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 8 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

The US has destroyed it's credibility against Russia's war of aggression by supporting Israel's genocide. It's undermining its own authority.

These things are connected.

How do you look at these two things and not draw connections or conclusions? Is history just a series of disconnected events to you?