this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2023
673 points (98.6% liked)

Asklemmy

43963 readers
2412 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] protput@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago (4 children)

A good alternative to keepass is a self hosted vaultwarden btw. (compiled from bitwardens opensource code iirc)

[โ€“] sol@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Vaultwarden is not compiled from Bitwarden's code, it's a separate project and codebase but designed to be compatible with Bitwarden's API.

Bitwarden is open source and you can self-host it but IIRC it's a bit more complex and resource-hungry than Vaultwarden.

[โ€“] dan@upvote.au 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They have totally different design goals which is why Bitwarden is more resource-hungry and more complex to deploy. Bitwarden can scale up to large use cases such as companies with hundreds of thousands of employees (it's what they run on the hosted version, after all), whereas Vaultwarden is designed to be small and light for home use cases where you almost always have <10 users total.

[โ€“] brayd@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 year ago

I agree. But I think is much easier for people to use KeePass compared to self hosting Vaultwarden

[โ€“] Concept1037@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I agree, I do this and it works great.

[โ€“] MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Nothing can beat passwords written on paper though

[โ€“] ghostwolf@lemmy.fakeplastictrees.ee 29 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[โ€“] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So I will write them on a rock, instead.

[โ€“] eating3645@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

But paper beats rock

I was talking about digital espionage, assuming one is not stupid enough to record their offline passwords digitally

[โ€“] dandroid@dandroid.app 2 points 1 year ago

But rock beats scissors. What if paper has an alliance with rock to be protected from scissors in return for paper not covering rock?

[โ€“] treadful@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 year ago

Physical access can. Indentations on the below page can. Fire and moisture can. Someone looking over your shoulder can.