this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2024
102 points (95.5% liked)

Home Video (VHS, DVD, Blu-ray, 4k)

701 readers
1 users here now

On Reddit we have r/dvdcollection, r/boutiquebluray, r/4kbluray, r/steelbook, r/vhs, etc but let's start simply with a community to cover all the forms of home video collecting.

So, do you feel nostalgic for a format? Are you looking forward to a release? Heard any exciting news? Want to show us your shelves? Then post away.

Elsewhere on the Fediverse:

Chat:

Rules:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

However, only some people think the restorations are bad, and now they have a surprising advocate – noted film preservationist Robert Harris. Harris is the man behind the famous restorations of Lawrence of Arabia, Spartacus, The Godfather trilogy and many more. In a post to Home Theatre Forum, he acknowledged how different they look, but also explained that’s not necessarily a bad thing. On True Lies, “Shot 35 and blown up to 70, the visuals of the new 4k UHD are absolutely not what the film was upon release, but the secret sauce works, and allows a presentation that appears far better than it might without it.”

In a post about Aliens, he elaborated a bit more on why these restorations have his approval. “Original prints were on the grainy side, as a higher speed stock was used. I always thought it looked fine, as that was the look. No problem. But there were those who felt that it was too grainy. Enter the new 4k UHD from Disney via Fox, and it has an entirely new look. And it’s a look that I like. Very much! The image has been de-grained, with zero loss of resolution, which if anything as been slightly heightened. Color are meticulously reproduced. And there’s an overall clarity that is new to the film.”

As far as Harris is concerned, these restorations have been done the right way, and there is a lot of logic behind what he says. Cameron always favoured shooting his film in a process called Super 35, as it allowed him to print a larger film frame on the stock that would make the home video releases look better. In True Lies or Titanic, he was able to show the films in 2:35:1 scope theatrically. Then, when reformatted to 1:33:1 (the standard TV ratio in the era before widescreen TVs), he could reveal more of the frame at the top and bottom, avoided the pan-and-scan look common at the time, making the films play better at VHS. The downside was Super 35 was grainy. This wasn’t super noticeable on DVD and even 1080p Blu-rays, but it proved problematic on 4K, hence the restoration.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ZagamTheVile@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I dunno. I haven't seen the 4k Alien yet but the grainy film I think deff added to the overall feel to it. It made it feel dirtier and more lived in. But I'll watch the 4k version. As far as people getting upset, I think it's a mix of "how dare you change the thing I like" and "leave well enough alone, just give us more new content".

[–] superfes@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (2 children)

It's stupid though, they haven't changed the thing people like, it's still there...

[–] ZagamTheVile@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

Yeah, but you've met people though, right?

[–] Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The problem is that physical media is taking a back seat to streaming, and companies like Disney may only offer the newer version.

So the thing you like may be replaced with something you don't like the look of, and if you hadn't procured a copy before, tough shit.

That's really more of an admonition of streaming than AI upscaling, though

[–] superfes@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

I hope physical media becomes popular again as people realize they don't want to be fed what they want...

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 0 points 7 months ago

Also the whole Star Wars Special Edition debacle (which has never been resolved) has everyone really nervous about these kinds of things.