this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2024
309 points (99.7% liked)

politics

19072 readers
4574 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Democrat Marilyn Lands defeated Republican Teddy Powell in a special election Tuesday night for a state House seat in north Alabama that drew national attention.

Lands, a licensed professional counselor, flipped the seat from red to blue by besting Powell, a Madison city councilman, 62 percent to 38 percent with 100percent of the precincts in District 10 reporting, according to unofficial results posted on the Alabama Secretary of State’s Office website.

The race drew national interest against the backdrop of the controversial Alabama State Supreme Court ruling that frozen embryos are considered children under state law.

The seat became vacant when ex-Rep. David Cole resigned after pleading guilty to illegal voting.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Jaysyn@kbin.social 46 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

By my reckoning, the GOP has lost 16 of their last 19 special elections. Several of them being in so called "red" states.

[–] kescusay@lemmy.world 33 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Yep. It's one of the reasons I'm skeptical of polling this year. It seems like the difficulty pollsters have reaching various demographics that are likely to vote for Democrats is getting worse, not better. They try to compensate by weighting their results, but it's not an exact science, and Dems are consistently overperforming versus what the polls say.

[–] Jaysyn@kbin.social 16 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Dems are consistently overperforming versus what the polls say.

It's been +9 points nationwide since Roe V. Wade was overturned.

[–] kescusay@lemmy.world 22 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Yep. That doesn't mean anything is in the bag, of course. We still have to fight like hell for every vote.

But it does mean we shouldn't be all doom and gloom.

[–] RippleEffect@lemm.ee 6 points 7 months ago

Honestly if people feel like it's in the bag, they're less likely to vote. Seeing losses might encourage higher turnout to overcorrect and this might well be how we end up with Trump again.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Many people change their minds at the last minute before casting their ballots. Polling is science, but not quite so at the same time.

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Not to mention the ones that just lie. No one will ever know so they do it just to throw a wrench in the machine. Someone said the other day, "We are all just poltergeists in meat suits."

[–] harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 7 months ago

Polling companies use landline numbers. That tends to skew the results in favor of T****.