this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2024
118 points (87.8% liked)

Asklemmy

43417 readers
1372 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The monotheistic all powerful one.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 45 points 5 months ago (5 children)

Mine is similar to yours in that it's about the power of God. It's called the Epicurean Trilemma:

  1. If a god is omniscient and omnipotent, then they have knowledge of all evil and have the power to put an end to it. But if they do not end it, they are not omnibenevolent.
  2. If a god is omnipotent and omnibenevolent, then they have the power to extinguish evil and want to extinguish it. But if they do not do it, their knowledge of evil is limited, so they are not omniscient.
  3. If a god is omniscient and omnibenevolent, then they know of all the evil that exists and wants to change it. But if they do not, which must be because they are not capable of changing it, so they are not omnipotent.

This proves fairly simply that God as commonly interpreted by modern Christians cannot exist. Early Christians and Jews had no problem here, because their god was simply not meant to be omnibenevolent. Go even further back in time and he was not omnipotent, and possibly not omniscient, either. "Thou shalt have no gods before me" comes from a time when proto-Jews were henotheists, people who believed in the existence of multiple deities while only worshipping a single one.

[–] CaptainBlagbird@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago

"Oh dear," says God, "I hadn't thought of that," and promptly vanishes in a puff of logic.

[–] t_berium@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Just leaving God's wife Ashera here. Yes, he was married once. Look it up.

[–] BallsandBayonets@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

He had a sister too, super evil but it's ok because a human dude talked her out of destroying everything since God couldn't stop her.

[–] lemonmelon@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago
[–] maegul@lemmy.ml 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

A simple way I’ve been touching on this for a while is what I call “The problem of existence”: why would god create a non-divine existence such as our selves?

Put aside evil. If God is all three omnis, why make something that is lesser? I figure that the answer is they themselves must also be lesser than the three omnis.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Idk people like being in charge of stuff and not being bored maybe God would be the same way

[–] KISSmyOS@feddit.de 4 points 5 months ago (6 children)

The Christian explanation for this is that god doesn't do evil, people do.
And god created people with free will to do evil. If he made people stop doing evil deeds, they would be his puppets, not free-willed humans. So he has the power to end all evil but chooses not to.

Now as for why god allows natural disasters, diseases and other tragedies to befall his creation – again, that's just the consequence of our actions, cause a woman gave an apple to her man in the past.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

And god created people with free will

Frankly, I don't buy this as an explanation even for human-created evil. It is still evidence that god cannot be tri-omni. Because it is still a situation in which god is able to remove evil and is aware of the evil, and yet he chooses to permit evil. Even evil done by one human against another, when the other is entirely innocent. And that cannot be omnibenevolent.

From how you phrased it I suspect you agree with me here, but the natural disasters argument is even more ludicrous. It doesn't even come close to working as a refutation of the Epicurian Trilemma.

[–] aphlamingphoenix@lemm.ee 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

If your options are "do as I say" or "suffer for all eternity" you aren't really capable of exercising free will.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 4 points 5 months ago

It's worse than that. It's "believe that you must do as I say, despite my complete refusal to create worthwhile evidence of my existence, and then do what I say" or "suffer for all eternity".

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

The Christian explanation for this is that god doesn't do evil, people do.
And god created people with free will to do evil. If he made people stop doing evil deeds, they would be his puppets, not free-willed humans.

I never understood this argument. If he's all-powerful, he would have the ability to eliminate all evil without affecting free will.

[–] CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The Christian god created every aspect of the universe and how it works. He therefore could have created a universe in which there was no such thing as evil or suffering, and given people in that universe free will. So even that doesn’t hold up.

[–] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I think that's their point; they're saying that's what God did. He "created a universe in which there was no such thing as evil or suffering and [gave] people in that universe free will."

And humans screwed it up.

I'm not saying that, mind you. I'm saying I think you just agreed with the person you're debating as a proof that they were wrong.

[–] CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

It doesn’t matter what you tack on, it doesn’t change my point — the only way humans could “screw it up” is if God made all the negative and horrible shit part of the universe. All you are saying is that God made a universe where there was no evil or suffering actively happening, but the concepts existed and were possible — because they ultimately happened and only possible things happen. And God chose to make them possible things as omnipotent creator of everything that exists.

[–] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Wait, so this God gives me true free will, and then places me in a world where I can't change anything? Everything is fixed, immovable? Or where I only have "good" choices available? Is that what you think God should have done? Like, how does your version even work?

Or does God give us fake free will, and keep our minds from thinking "bad" thoughts?

If I'm free, I can screw up. Otherwise, I'm not free.

[–] CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

No. You aren’t getting it. The Christian god created every aspect of the universe. Light and dark. Up and down. You are still thinking about our universe, in which these negative things are possible, and how you would have to be restricted in what you do in our universe in order to prevent you from doing certain things. But god could have set all the parameters of the universe differently such that they just didn’t exist at all. You wouldn’t miss them or be prevented from doing them. It would be like if there were a fifth cardinal direction in an alternate universe, and someone in that universe thought “if god prevented me from going in that direction, I wouldn’t have free will anymore”. But here we are, with only four cardinal directions, and free will. We aren’t being stopped from doing anything, it just isn’t part of our universe and doesn’t even make sense in it.

[–] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 months ago

I think I get what you're saying but it is a little bit beyond me.

I still wonder if the problem doesn't come down to Free Will itself. Regardless of what universe one is living in, if you have only two people in it and they each have free will at some point the free will of one is going to intrude on the free will of the other, and they're going to require some kind of negotiation or polite accommodation. Some kind of social interaction.

And if one doesn't take this action but instead proceeds with one's free will regardless of the other's free will there is a problem that is inevitably going to exist no matter what universe exists.

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago

But we don't have free will. The bible makes that perfectly clear in Romans 9.

[–] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Christian here, don't agree with your "biblical" interpretation

[–] KISSmyOS@feddit.de 1 points 5 months ago

If Christians could agree with each other about what's in the bible, history would be a lot more boring.

[–] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 months ago

God is not Omnibenevolent would be my take.