this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2024
373 points (85.8% liked)

Memes

45724 readers
921 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Churbleyimyam@lemm.ee 16 points 8 months ago (1 children)

If nuclear stops getting outstripped by renewables on cost I might be more interested in it.

[–] Xavienth@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Only when you don't include grid storage

[–] Churbleyimyam@lemm.ee 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yeah that is problem. It did just make me think though: I read recently about a UK project to build a solar farm in the Moroccan desert the size of greater London and lay undersea cables all the way back to southwest England. They claim it will be half the cost of the new Hinkley C reactor, which is just up the road and that includes building from scratch the ship to lay the cables. Now, instead of having this solar farm to the south, in a similar timezone, what if it could be to the east or west? There is already an international grid in this part of the world, so perhaps if it was extended, there could be renewable energy coming in from wherever, whenever it was being produced. The sun is usually out and the wind blowing somewhere. That would reduce the burden of storage. It would also require a high level of cooperation and trust, which has its pros and cons.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 3 points 8 months ago

If you think about it, the energy coming in from the sun and either heating the ground or stirring the air is constant. A big enough collection network would transmit that underlying steady signal eventually.