this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2023
193 points (94.5% liked)

Linux

48078 readers
975 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Oracle responds to Red Hat

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Raphael@lemmy.world 59 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Even ORACLE is calling out Red Hat.

Who's next, Apple?

Currently testing Debian in a VM, I have lots of files so I need to set everything straight before I switch.

[–] what@discuss.tchncs.de 33 points 1 year ago

Not because Oracle likes open source, but because they like to profit from RedHat's hard work.

[–] MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I suppose Apple uses Linux in some of their servers, so maybe. But their desktop product is Darwin so I don't think that's getting any votes

[–] Raphael@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Their desktop product is a stolen BSD.

[–] MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Indeed, but with that kind of licensing there's nothing stopping them. We already found limitations of GPL with RedHat, I think all of these licenses need an overhaul

[–] nan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Note that they still share code for much of Darwin, even where the license does not require it: https://github.com/apple-oss-distributions

[–] MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

True, but from what I hear, the dumps don't really help much. Better than nothing, I suppose

[–] Jagger2097@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If they wanted their code to be sharealike, the developers could have chosen a different license. Apple is contributing more than is required so don't complain?

[–] MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

The point is Apple doesn't actually want to help the community - they might be hoping that someone goes through their dumps and finds a vulnerability and reports it to them. Free community sourced labour.

If they really wanted to help, MacOS should have been GPLv3. But we know that's not how Apple functions.