this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2023
193 points (94.5% liked)

Linux

48078 readers
975 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Oracle responds to Red Hat

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zeth0s@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (7 children)

What I don't understand is: who is using oracle linux? Never heard of a single person or company using it?

One must be really far from linux to choose oracle linux among hundreds of available distros

[–] demonsword@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

One must be really far from linux to choose oracle linux among hundreds of available distros

Not really a choice when the products they sell (their database/cloud solutions) are tied to it or RHEL. But yeah, I doubt there's many who'd call it their favorite distro

[–] Molecular0079@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Me neither. And I always wondered why you wouldn't just go directly to the source and go with RedHat for enterprise usecases. Perhaps cheaper support contracts?

[–] smo@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We struggled with red hat because our product is usually in airgapped installations. We know how many we’ve sold, but we don’t know how many are still in use.

Say a customer buys one unit. Then 5 years later, they replace it. And 5 years on, they replace it again. On the books that’s 3 sold. We don’t know that two were retired, we don’t know these are all the same installation. So red hat wants us to pay 3 annual licences for this, and those licences don’t end until we can prove the installation was retired. The costs effectively snowball indefinitely.

We wanted to pay - it was the easiest route to certain federal qualifications. But we couldn’t come to an agreement on how to pay.

[–] Molecular0079@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ah ic, thanks for sharing your experience! So which RHEL derivative did you end up going with?

[–] smo@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Rocky for now, but I can’t say that’s set in stone

[–] garam@lemmy.my.id 1 points 1 year ago

Rocky still walkaround using UBI source, and it's open, so in the end it's 99.99% compatible with RHEL.

Just fuck CIQ with their contract...

[–] DawnOfRiku@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If you're using a software suite that requires Oracle Database, it and RHEL are safe options. It's used where I work for that reason, but only relating to said software. This vendor only officially supports those 2 distros, and to a lesser extent Windows.

[–] Hexadecimalkink@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

It would be corporate clients that are already all on Oracle for their careers. I've met guys that have built their entire career on Oracle and if you suggest any other software they'll try to politically assassinate you. Some people just care about money not the work they do.

[–] winterayars@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Pathetic wretches who couldn't escape Oracle's clutches, mostly.

[–] Nefyedardu@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

My company was starting to use OEL extensively over the past few months.