this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2024
192 points (83.6% liked)

News

23397 readers
4885 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] snekerpimp@lemmy.world 105 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Considering it’s him or “bloodbath for the country” McGee, I think we are all angry and anxious about it.

[–] Stern@lemmy.world 29 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Getting real tired of choosing between bad and worse, and knowing full well if I don't support bad I'll get stuck with worse because of the duopoly.

[–] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 72 points 8 months ago (4 children)

Outside of Gaza, I think Biden has done a surprisingly good job. A lot of shit landed on his plate and he's dealt with it better than most presidents would have.

[–] hydrospanner@lemmy.world 42 points 8 months ago (2 children)

And while he may not be as progressive as many progressives would like him to be, I feel he's been more progressive than most ever expected him to be...which is pleasantly surprising, since it's not a course he had to take for political reasons.

[–] Pan_Ziemniak@midwest.social 2 points 8 months ago

Yeah.... i kinda feel this is more bc of increasing pressure via political climate, givenhis record in the senate, which also seems to go under the radar.

[–] Xin_shill@lemm.ee -5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

If he hadn’t he would have lost all support from people who actually voted for him. Minimal effort is effort I guess.

[–] hydrospanner@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I completely disagree.

I think even if he had gone more to the center, he wouldn't have lost any significant portion of the progressive vote he did get, and I think this holds true this year as well. (And at that, a shift to the middle would likely have netted him more votes pulled from disillusioned non-MAGA moderate Republicans in 2020 than he lost far left Lemmy-user votes).

Having the name Donald Trump on the other side of the ballot is sufficiently powerful motivation for most reasonable progressives to "hold their nose and cast their ballot" for Biden. It might be a very different story if Biden were running against, say, a John Kasich or Larry Hogan, but that's not what we've got. In that case, many on the left wing may see it more as a "both sides are the same so I'm voting third party to make a statement" election...but again, this isn't that. In 2020 and now again in 2024, the choice is more accurately, "not making much ground on progressive causes" vs "regression on all fronts, combined with an attack on democracy, emboldening of fascists, racists, and militant bigots of all stripes".

...and personally, if a progressive can look at that decision and think they're basically the same thing...I see that as only slightly less disappointing than a loud and proud MAGA zombie.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Seeing the sheer stupidity of the left wing is making me question democracy.

[–] hydrospanner@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Seeing the sheer stupidity of most Lemmy users who proudly align themselves as leftists is making me question leftists in general.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago

There have always been dumbass leftists. I think this is the most vocal I've ever seen them though. And the most numerous. In previous elections we've been able to ignore them. Or at the very least, redirect them to doing something good, like punching Nazis.

Now they're more likely to team up with the Nazis against rational people.

[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago (3 children)

If people really followed Biden's attempts to rein in Bibi, they would have a LOT more appreciation of his efforts too. Netanyahu is a madman yet Israel still needs protection.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 months ago

It seems to me that it really strains credulity to suggest that the US has no further ability to reign in Natanyahu, especially if Isreal needs protection that badly. They basically depend on the US for their existence, but they also have the US over a barrel? How does that square up?

[–] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

I think the problem is even for people who have followed it, he's still funding his genocide. I think Biden had helped with the bombing pause and hostage release. But since then, his attempts to rein Bibi in have fallen flat and he's given a blank check.

You make a good point about what if he stop supporting them and they are attacked. Israel is just as much a victim as Gaza. That would pretty quickly turn back around on Biden from a political perspective too.

[–] juicy@lemmy.today 0 points 8 months ago

Israel needs protection to continue its apartheid. If it ceased its illegal occupation of Gaza and the West Bank and allowed Palestinians to return to their homes per international law, it wouldn't have nearly so many enemies.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml -3 points 8 months ago

I still think that counts as "less bad," not "good," considering pretty much all presidents are absolutely bad.

[–] yarr@feddit.nl -4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It's possible to support 3rd parties in the US. Just not for the 2024 presidential case. If you really want to support them, unfortunately you will have to do more than just appear at the ballot box.

[–] cheesebag@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

3rd parties in the US are impossible while we still have first past the post voting. One party has consistently been the one to support & pass RCV, while the other has consistently repealed & banned it. Guess which is which?

If you want 3rd parties to be a viable option, you need to vote Democrats. And more on the ground activism, I agree with you there

[–] yarr@feddit.nl 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

If you want 3rd parties to be a viable option, you need to vote Democrats.

HOO. That would be like democrats voting for their own destruction. One of the only things Republicans and Democrats agree on is our current 2 party system, as it perpetuates them into eternity without any real competition and enable them to use wedge issues to get votes instead of doing actual work.

[–] cheesebag@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Ok doomer. That's entirely false. I provided sources showing, as I said, that Dems support RCV and GOP does not. Tell me: which party instituted RCV in North Carolina? And which party repealed it under the guise of "voter security"?