EDIT: NOW CLOSED! Thank you to everyone that entered! 💙
As part of the v1 launch, I’m hoping to adopt a new community-driven app icon! 🥰 As promised, here is the thread for your submissions! I can’t wait to see what you all come up with!
NOTE: Please only post finalized submissions here! If you would like to workshop your submission with the community, feel free to make a separate thread. :)
What do I win??
wefwef *ahem* Voyager is a free and open source project, so there isn't a cash prize or anything. But, credit to you will be officially in the app settings and the Github repo readme!
Submission deadline
Submissions accepted NOW through July 16th, 10pm CT (depending on submission volume, may be extended).
Selection process
I will lock the thread after the submission window and nominate 3 icons (see below tips for what I’m looking for). I’ll take into account votes and comments from people. :) If there are very few submissions, I may extend the window to submit. Shortly after, I’ll create another thread for the community to vote to choose one of the final three!
Tips
- I encourage you to make the app icon FUN and colorful! Give the app a soul that reflects the community driven nature of Lemmy and the greater Fediverse. Icons using the display-p3 colorspace are encouraged. I love how an interconnected rainbow represents the Fediverse, and I’d love to see your personal artistic style :)
- I am purposely allowing raster icons for this contest, because I think too many app icons look bland, generic and… well… corporate vector bleh. I love the fun style of these Fediverse illustrations by David Revoy: https://framablog.org/2022/12/08/framasoft-2022-a-casserole-cooked-up-thanks-to-you-thanks-to-your-donations/?print=print
Rules
Edited 2am CT Jul 10: Added rule against AI generated artwork
- 3 submissions max per artist
- 🆕 No AI generated art, please
- Please, no submissions resembling the Apollo icon (sorry!) to respect Apollo’s app icon branding
- For each submission, required assets:
- (For contest submission)
- Single 512x512 square PNG designed for iOS should be in your comment. (If you have an iOS device, I recommend this site to test)
- Optional sentence or two explaining your icon
- (Upon being selected)
- 1024x1024 PNG or SVG iOS app icon.
- 1024x1024 PNG or SVG “maskable” variant for Android app icon. Tips here: https://web.dev/maskable-icon
- BONUS/OPTIONAL Splash screen image - Design a full screen app launch screen that is maskable to fit various device aspect ratios. This is totally optional.
- (For contest submission)
- Your work should be licensed under CC-BY-SA 4.0, or less restrictive. :)
This is such a fun and cool idea, but.
Please, absolutely do not choose an AI generated piece. If people have to prove the piece is genuine via sending in a PSD, SAI file, etc (any file that shows layers) or sketches. So be it.
An AI piece would take away from the fun and authenticity from this. Artists, writers, voice actors, and other creative are having a hard time as it is with the rise of AI. And the AI bros defending it. A person who uses AI and calls themselves an artist is the same energy as someone taking a frozen meal and heating it up a microwave calling themselves a chef.
AI Is an interesting tool and has its uses, but people are abusing it right now and it's getting harder and harder to tell what is authentic.
Hey! I appreciate this point and I will add it to the rules (hopefully nobody is offended with me changing them after starting)
Also, because this comment isn't an actual submission, I will probably remove it at some point. I hope you can understand :)
Absolutely up to you of course, but I really disagree with OP's premise. The best icon should win, not the most "handcrafted" or whatever. AI assisted tooling has gone mainstream at least since Photoshop included generative fill as a first class feature, excluding it from such a competition on the basis of "the poor artists have it rough" seems like an odd take to me. Especially since you could easily use AI for all relevant layers and then submit the Photoshop file with it.
I hear ya, but at the same time I would probably appreciate a human artists work more. Don't ask me why, I can't articulate it just yet. Probably something about how a person creating art is more relatable and sometimes the story behind a peice can be just as if not more important than the end product. That said, it's just an app logo so who knows. But I vote for a human artist to create it
My point is that not all AI work is "enter prompt and let Midjourney poop out the final product", and if you use Photoshop's built in AI tools you wouldn't even know that AI was involved to begin with. If I put that mouse logo through a SD ControlNet, let it generate something, put that into Photoshop, comp it onto a separate background, then there is zero way for you to know if AI was involved or not. This is a larger conversation of course, where to draw the line, when is something "human made" (pencils on paper, tablet, 3D modeling tool, AI assisted tool, AI only, etc.). The rule should be: no bad entries. Entries that are clearly AI generated are bad, so there's that.
You're 100% right. I'm being slightly naive but still prefer it be as human made as possible, not sure where that line in the sand is though
Completely understandable, thank you for responding to the comment and not just deleting it in the first place! AI is a pretty contentious topic but most of it was trained on art where the artist didn't consent on having their art used for training or being synthed. I see so many people that take commissions and make money of this, but don't disclose they are using AI. Some people care, many don't.
I am inspired to make an Icon, so we'll see. =)