Linux

48364 readers

816 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

nooter692@lemmy.ml

MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml

cypherpunks@lemmy.ml

cyclohexane@lemmy.ml

d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz

172

What's your favorite terminal? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 8 months ago by GravitySpoiled@lemmy.ml to c/linux@lemmy.ml

178 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I'm looking for a new terminal. What's your favorite one and why? Which one is popular?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Shareni@programming.dev 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Alacritty because it's a minimal black rectangle, perfect for using with a tiling WM

[–] mac@infosec.pub 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

foot is also a good choice for a minimal terminal emulator.

[–] Shareni@programming.dev 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You forgot to mention it's wayland only. This was disappointing, it looks like it's got some nice features...

[–] mac@infosec.pub 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yeah I mean there's a lot of benefits and increased security on Wayland now so it's definitely worth the transition to.

[–] Shareni@programming.dev 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

i'm on xfce so i'd need to change my de
swhkd seems to be abandoned, and i couldn't get it to run, so i'd need to change a lot about my wm setup on top of moving to sway
nvidia issues
permission issues (screen sharing for example)
i'd also need to replace other tools, shortcuts, etc. so they use the wayland alternatives

Definitely not worth it just to get fractional scaling, and some theoretical security improvements on an OS that's already quite secure. I tried using it for a few weeks on KDE, and I had to go back to x11 for something almost every day.

[–] mac@infosec.pub 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Weird, I've not required X for anything since I started using it, I also just use my Window Manager to bind hotkeys (usually Sway)

[–] Shareni@programming.dev 1 points 8 months ago

I prefer to use sxhkd for all shortcuts except for starting the terminal, and some wm specific commands. It allows me to keep a really short wm config, and have an easier time trying out new ones.