this post was submitted on 29 Feb 2024
123 points (97.7% liked)

politics

19072 readers
4412 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Diva@lemmy.ml 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The extremely American experience of writing a letter to your congressional rep with a 0% chance of it ending up anywhere other than the trash, unread.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Letters to congress critters, like all correspondence, is looked at by the aides. Letters carry more weight than phone calls,etc. They can see by the postmark if you are part of their voting block, and there is an assumption that if you took time to write them there are at least 10 others that feel the same way you do. Doesn't mean the Congressman will agree with you, though.

[–] Diva@lemmy.ml 4 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I've received numerous fuckoff letters back from aides, signed by my (dem) reps. I don't see the difference between that and my original letter ending up in the trash.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The difference is that your point of view is kept track of, somewhere. They make the decision that they don't care, because their re-election does not depend on your vote. But they still track it.

If they start getting a lot of letters on a particular topic, it will prompt some sort of response.

[–] Diva@lemmy.ml 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I've been doing plenty of antiwar organizing, the routine is you organize getting hundreds of letters sent, working hard to make sure it's actual constituents, I've even gone to hand off in person to the aides. You always get a letter like 6 months later with a non-response, vowing to keep doing what they've been doing.

They are not tracking anything for anything more than PR management, it takes actual leverage to influence their decisions.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

No, they are tracking it, the sad truth though is that even with all your work, they have made the dara-driven decision that your anti-war cause doesn't matter to their re-election chances.

[–] Diva@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago

And that's why I voted Uncommitted and am urging everyone I know to withhold their votes from these people

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Like I said, it doesn't mean they will agree with you.

[–] Diva@lemmy.ml 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It's why I encourage everyone to vote Uncommitted downballot as well

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

That is throwing your vote away. Consequences are on you.

[–] Diva@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago

It's not like it does anything, the president literally gets picked by a system designed to ignore the popular vote