this post was submitted on 29 Feb 2024
37 points (76.1% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35316 readers
1012 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Another day, another threat of nuclear retaliation against the West by Putin.

Realistically, if Russia were to launch missiles against European capitals, how long a warning would the inhabitants get? What about North America (USA, Canada)?

Does NATO have the capability of in-flight interception? Or other defense mechanisms?

How deep underground is safe to protect against a modern nuclear blast?

Stay safe y'all.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Coreidan@lemmy.world 31 points 6 months ago (3 children)

No one is launching nukes. Stop letting the news terrorize you.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

What?

Did you forget about all the stuff with Putin likely being terminal and that's why he took the risk to invade Ukraine?

If that psycho is really dying, and his last wish is to bring Ukraine back to Russia to rebuild an empire...

Eventually he'll win or he'll use nukes.

He doesn't give a fuck about anything except his legacy. If it can't be for unifying Russia, it'll be for going out for n a blaze of "glory".

You're forgetting a lot of nuclear armed countries are being run by insane people.

[–] Coreidan@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

And yet he still won’t use them

[–] awwwyissss@lemm.ee 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

You're right, and additionally he can't just decide to use them unilaterally. Launching those nukes would take a bunch of egotistical, self-centered sociopaths all deciding to commit suicide together.

[–] xePBMg9@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Or it just takes a chain of people that have been watching Russian state controlled news since they learned to walk.

[–] awwwyissss@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago

The people at the top making these decisions don't believe the propaganda.

[–] iAmTheTot@kbin.social 5 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Eventually he’ll win or he’ll use nukes.

Thankfully, not even Putin can launch missiles on his own. For one, I wouldn't expect him to even know how.

There have been nuclear scares before, and the goodness of man has often prevented them. Famously, during the cold war, Russian computers erroneously detected a US missile launch, and despite being ordered to retaliate, Stanislav Petrov correctly deduced it was an error and did not launch.

[–] awwwyissss@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago

Happened in the US too. A NORAD computer basically said "they launched the nukes" but it was actually the moon.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 1 points 6 months ago

Great, now we're relying on the professionalism of the Russian army for survival

[–] YorddleZiggs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)
[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 11 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The difference is that unlike Ukraine, the West is entirely capable of making enough Russians hurt in retaliation that even if Putin survives the exchange he's looking at going the way of the Romanovs once the survivors outside the bunkers get to him.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

A nuclear exchange on that scale would kill 300 million people instantly and another 5 BILLION over the next decade.

Nobody wins.

[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago

Yeah, so when nobody wins, neither does Putin is my point

[–] Valmond@lemmy.mindoki.com 4 points 6 months ago

That's a stupid take, russia lied 2 years ago but now we should believe them?

Nuclear war! nuclear war! nuclear war! we heard it since 1980 or even before.

You can't use it, and nobody is "invading" russia. Maybe we should and remove those deadly weapons from this child-putin.

[–] retrieval4558@mander.xyz -1 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Do some reading about near misses during the cold war and see if you keep that same certainty.

[–] Coreidan@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

And yet it still never happened. The Cold War has only harden my resolve on nukes never being launched.

It gets old listening to the sky is falling rhetoric.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 4 points 6 months ago

It only gives me more certainty.

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 months ago

With how many near misses we've had, it seems more likely to near miss than to hit