52
More than half of Tory members in poll say Islam a threat to British way of life
(www.theguardian.com)
this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2024
52 points (98.1% liked)
UK Politics
3110 readers
142 users here now
General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.
Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.
Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.
If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)
Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.
Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.
!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
You mean : https://www.theguardian.com/education/2021/may/26/batley-teacher-suspended-after-showing-charlie-hebdo-image-can-return
He should not have knowingly shown something offensive, but mob justice is no justice for his indiscretion.
Yes, I've heard this kind of hand-wringing, victim-blaming bullshit before, as if it somehow excuses the complete snowflake parents who were offended by it and sent him into hiding with death threats.
We don't have blasphemy laws in this country and we shouldn't act like we do just because of some overly sensitive religious loons.
I agree there should have been an angry mob wanting to lynch him.
But I don't think teachers should knowingly cause offense either. If he didn't know, then he is pretty dim. If a science teacher started saying, as fact, there was no gods, some parents would get offended. The response would depend on the area.
Neither should have happened. The mob is worse I agree. Hard to prove it had violent intent though.
He wasn't showing a depiction of Mohammed to be edgy or cause offence. He was doing it to teach a lesson about political and religious messaging. He was, you know, being a teacher.
It only seems to be Muslims that act like this. If I use "Jesus" as a swear word, or say that Jesus was not God incarnate, that's deeply offensive to Christians. Would I get a mob of Christians sending me death threats, or would they just ignore me, think I'm a knob and get on with their day?
Besides, you can't "cause offence". Offence cannot be given, only taken. And what offends people differs everywhere. You can't keep policing your language in case some nutter takes offence to it.
It's really really ignorant to not know that was going to cause offence to Μuslims. The reason it was so well know is the riots it caused. So I think he knew he was going to cause offence.
And it's not just Muslims, there are plenty of dangerously crazy christians (too much of the US!). I'd wonder if it was monotheism being fundamentalist, but then there crazy Hindus and Buddhists and everything else. I think it's just humans. Especially in groups/mobs.
Anything can be offensive to some. That article is over 2 years old. Not sure if he's back at work but the rent a mob will have moved to another target by now.
The article is still less old than the event. He should have known that was offensive but there should have been no mob.
Edit: english