Ask Lemmy
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Please don't post about US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com.
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
view the rest of the comments
I think this issue is also more nuanced than you'll see it given credit for in the media.
I think there's some strong "War in Iraq" parallels that can be drawn that might help reflect why the US is reacting the way they are.
To summarize, small group of terrorists commit an attack that is one of the worst in the nations history. This country that was attacked has a much better funded military, and they roll in to exact retribution, notionally under the banner of "stopping the people who did this and not letting it happen again." The war of revenge is hugely detrimental to the civilian population therein, and human rights violations occur.
Most establishment politicians were/are fully on board with the War in Iraq. Why wouldn't they be on board with Israel right now? It's basically the same situation again.
I think that a lot of what you see online forgets that this wasn't some random thing where Israel just decided to commit a genocide out of nowhere. But just like how 9/11 didn't justify the War in Iraq, 10/7 doesn't justify what's happening now. But it's somewhat understandable why it's happening, and why people support it.
I remember right after 9/11, the vast majority of people were on board with sending troops in. The dissenters were super few and far between. This is just that again, but Israel this time.
Iraq didn't have anything to do with 9-11. I think you mean Afghanistan.
Oh how soon we all forget...
You are technically correct. The best kind of correct. :)
I was using "The War in Iraq" as a cover term for the whole ongoing conflict that arose in the aftermath of 9/11.
I think that your point actually furthers my parallel though. As the US was in Afghanistan, the Bush Administration's obsession with Iraq ended up with them pushing questionable Intel that there were Al Queda controlled WMDs in Iraq, and that we had to invade there as well if we really wanted to win the war.
There's a pretty clear parallel between that logic and the "Hamas Tunnels" arguments we're hearing out of Israel at the moment.
One day they will release the full uncut and unedited videos of the tunnels so we can see where they all started, ran, and ended.
Probably any day now with how good the deepfakes are getting
Understand this, all reading this thread, though:
The DarkHexad of human-evil's dimensions, is:
The more abused some population is, the more they become embedded in DarkHexad mind/meaning.
Hamas went nihilist.
They knew that Israel'd commit to genociding all Palestinians, to all the extent they could, and that's why they did the attack.
Israel's now is demonstrating its nihilism/sadism so blatently that their "deterrent" is being permanently corroded-away:
Within a few years, the surrounding Muslim region won't care how much damage/violence Israel does to them while they're annihilating Israel, they'll HAVE TO annihilate Israel, at ANY cost.
Israel's guaranteeing its own within-decade annihilation.
Exactly as Hamas' ( either unconsciously or consciously ) strategy determined.
Israel walked into the trap, they ate the bait.
2 millenia ago, the ONLY Jew in the world that no Zionist would tolerate to have any validity, Yehoshua "Jesus" benJoseph, warned that when the abomination Daniel spoke-of was becoming real, that Israel would be annihilated.
( Matt 24, iirc .. here, I dug it up, just in case anybody wants to read the actual text: https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=matt+24%3A15-22&version=AMPC )
Perfect & correct warning.
Within 1 decade, Israel's going to be annihilated, exactly as benJoseph warned, and the Zionists, themselves, are the ones enforcing that no alternative-future can happen.
Comical, really: one's-own ideology/prejudice absolutely determining one's fate, in a way that makes one's most-hated-individual proven-right.
"Deterrent" only works when the ones hating your life are hesitating because of their aversion to the harm you can do them.
Israel's not going to have any "deterrent" soon.
And they're too ideology/prejudice rabid to know that simple human-nature meaning.
When, in a decade, perhaps less, Israel's been annihilated, how is the rest of the Middle East, now committed/allied with BRICS, going to tilt the world's geopolitical table?
No matter: Trump's already said he'll "delete" the constitution, leave NATO, back Russia, create crime in Washington DC, be dictator, & "MAGA", right?
That is going to happen, unfortunately, and the incompetence of the Biden-institution is playing directly into handing the entire US into Trump-cult's hands.
The economic rug-pull that they're delaying can't be held-back forever, either.
Backlash-vote always torpedoes the incumbents, in that situation.
It doesn't even matter if legalism "prohibits" Trump becoming GEOTUS, now: legalists ignore all the letter-of-the-law that contradicts their intention, ..
.. and that is sooo traditional for legalists that benJoseph railed against their doing that 2 millenia ago.
Something like "you who hold the letter-of-the-law rules, who ignore even 1 part, are guilty of ALL", iirc.
That is exactly the nature of the legalism of nowadays.
The real game going-on is that human-unconscious-ignorance is trying to enforce a simplistic "mythic" "importance" through global tantrum/pogrom.
And arguing with humanity's unconscious-toddler .. requires a bit of rather-brutal experience-induced-understanding enforcement, and that isn't going to happen until "armageddon" has beaten that understanding into our unconscious.
The Great Filter.
Won't-grow-up is the most-fundamental religion, in our unconscious.
_ /\ _