this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2024
69 points (94.8% liked)

Technology

61227 readers
4938 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
69
Early Adopters of Microsoft’s AI Bot Wonder if It’s Worth the Money (www.wsj.com)
submitted 11 months ago by IbnLemmy to c/technology@lemmy.world
14 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Artificial-intelligence aide handles email, meetings and other things, but its price and limited use have some skeptical

Microsoft’s new artificial-intelligence assistant for its bestselling software has been in the hands of testers for more than six months and their reviews are in: useful, but often doesn’t live up to its price.

The company is hoping for one of its biggest hits in decades with Copilot for Microsoft 365, an AI upgrade that plugs into Word, Outlook and Teams. It uses the same technology as OpenAI’s ChatGPT and can summarize emails, generate text and create documents based on natural language prompts.

Companies involved in testing say their employees have been clamoring to test the tool—at least initially. So far, the shortcomings with software including Excel and PowerPoint and its tendency to make mistakes have given some testers pause about whether, at $30 a head per month, it is worth the price

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 6 points 11 months ago

In my experience it gets tech stuff wrong frequently, in my case often supplying incorrect JIRA queries. GPT-4 blows it out of the water in most every regard. The image creation also seems to be inherently evil; it even replied to me with a mischievous devil emoji once when asked to make a creepy image and it seemed delighted, then its governor kicked in and it returned an error. And sometimes it comes up with stuff far darker than I ever intended, and it gets through.