privatelife - privacy, security, freedom advocacy

What are you saying??? like you sell drugs, yes, that's others' fault to fall into it, but to prevent others to fall, YOU must be killed (destroyed).

Don't drag others down like you are now.

Many people fall into that privacy and security rabbit hole, while they want to learn COMPUTER SCIENCE!!!

COLLAPSE YOURSELF, PLEASE!

For script kiddies like me in the past, and you now, who doesn't do programming.

You need to get more angry and burst a nerve, OR YOU CAN DO THIS... figure out what you want, stop obsessing over what others want, and if you really think you could bring a change, try it. You are writing a lot of weird things. And you lack maturity, no offense. I assume you are young.

Not many people who seek privacy these days are remotely even interested in attaining true privacy or anonymity, but merely circlejerking their choice of software, OS and phone brand on the internet. The understanding of privacy culture goes far deeper than the surface scratching you managed to do, let alone thinking you could resolve things for others. First resolve your inner conflict.

By using BSD, especially OpenBSD, I started thinking what is considered "correct".

In "privacy" sense nobody cares about some Intel or Microsoft version of Linux or BSD. OpenBSD, NetBSD, most of them are similar enough, and they are not giving you security merely by using them. And I am not even going to get into the discussion of daily driver usability, because I daily Debian and have Windows debloated on dualboot.

No faults here, it is just WinRAR is legally unusable.

Please do some serious data archival and preservation for atleast a decade to be eligible to talk on this topic.

If I recall correctly, you are the person who always teach us to use open source software. And do "FOSS android" (actually installing a bunch of "FOSS" trash/applications with adb(?) ). If you aren't, please correct me.

Yes, I teach, but I also address/teach the philosophy of open versus closed source software in Linux/Windows guide. F(L)OSS is not inherently an ideology or religion you seem to treat it like. It is simply a different way of licensing software code, and at a very basic level it bifurcates into a transparent (freedom) software development culture. Capitalists and advertisers abusing closed source methods to cloak malware/spyware does not make closed sourcing itself fundamentally evil. The intent of those horrible people (and 3 letter agencies) is what counts.

You are the fake privacy circuses. But techlore and GrapheneOS community and all other community are the same.

You can whine as much as you want. I have shown everyone what I can do, and have done. Asked no money and formed no harassing cult around it, worked against it.

GrapheneOS itself at least is much more secure (in exploit mitigations) by creating privacy through security, not creating security through privacy.

It is not doing anything noticeable for security. They just market (mostly) snake oil, and have a bunch of users shilling it from 4chan to reddit to Telegram. Rebranding AOSP features is not a feat by any means. I have talked about this before and I will not address it again.

I think the OpenBSD crowd is a bunch of masturbating monkeys, in that they make such a big deal about concentrating on security

Atleast quote properly Torv... oh sorry Linyos Torovoltos evil Soviet hacker.