this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2023
8 points (66.7% liked)

privatelife - privacy, security, freedom advocacy

1555 readers
1 users here now

This community is meant to advocate privacy, security and freedom in an concise manner, free of prejudice bias, free of politics, free of cultist thoughts.

Arguing that you don't care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don't care about free speech because you have nothing to say. - Edward Snowden

Reddit: https://old.reddit.com/r/privatelife

Matrix: https://matrix.to/#/#privatelife:matrix.org

Telegram: https://t.me/r_privatelife

READ THE RULES

  1. Opinions are welcome, facts more so. Attack arguments, not people. Hating, baiting, trolling, flaming will be dealt with strictly.

  2. Discuss closed source software with caution. Advocating for it strongly (cult brigading) can be treated as violation of this rule.

  3. Editing titles of article links is strictly prohibited, unless and until the summarisation remains accurate to the context of the article or paper. Such link post will be removed without questioning.

  4. Targeting of any country, person or nation is strictly prohibited without valid reasoning. Evidence if not presented against the specific company/corporation/individual will be treated as personal attack and/or hate speech. This will result in a warning, then ban system.

  5. NO PERMA BANS! Ban system will work as follows:

1 day --> 3 day --> 1 week --> 2 weeks --> 3 weeks --> 1 month --> 3 months --> 6 months

Severity of the ban system will be dealt with based on degree of violation and circumstances.

  1. NO FACT-LESS EVIDENCES, NO FALSE RHETORIC Evidence has to be credible. The onus of this lies on the claimant. The same applies on the user who questions proven evidence. Violation of this rule will be dealt with strictly.

  2. Copycat posts serve to litter the community, increasing quantity and decreasing quality of posts. As such, posts will be removed. Repeated attempts will receive warning.


Related communities:

founded 4 years ago
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Much naive than a kid who haven't gone to high school.

I thought you have better education than me.

I have no reason to take you seriously.

They aren't giving me security. Never claimed. They just teach me what is correct and superior, and that's my experience. And they concentrate me on programming and computer science, not debloating or hardening !

Need to whine more. Maybe I will end up listening to you? And no, you do seem to me like an idiot, because you are arguing one type of knowledge is superior to other. Almost feels like a 4chan script kiddie.

Please do some serious data archival and preservation for atleast a decade to be eligible to talk on this topic.

Legally. Unusable.

If software is not licensed FOSS, it becomes legally unusable? Are you using trash like ChatGPT to generate these responses?

What you do is writing bullshit "You will not believe this, but Linux and Windows are almost identical today". If the setup is bloated (for guys who doesn't do programming), they are identical. (practical privacy, again?)

Then whine more, cry more and deboonk me. You have yet not spoken one sentence that has meaning. Not on Reddit, not on Lemmy. Not one, and I do not expect one.

Linux-hardened and hardened_malloc? hardened_malloc broke firefox.

Linus was right. You people really have no clue and understand zilch about computing and security.

I have no reason left to entertain a "masturbating monkey" like you anymore, atleast not from all you have said till now, so I will simply stop wasting my time. I do not want your whining over here, if this is all you do. You already made it clear that "privacy" is "inferior" to "computer science", one of the stupidest things I have ever heard in my life, so you simply hate privacy communities due to your own delusions, blame them, have nothing to do with them yet still probably want to interact with them for some reason that originates back to your delusions. Keep them to yourself.

[–] scratchandgame@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I have no reason to take you seriously.

GG!

Need to whine more. Maybe I will end up listening to you? And no, you do seem to me like an idiot, because you are arguing one type of knowledge is superior to other. Almost feels like a 4chan script kiddie.

I don't need you to understand that switching to BSD give me more experience and end the privacy race, not end the privacy race by switching to BSD.

This is my experience.

If software is not licensed FOSS, it becomes legally unusable? Are you using trash like ChatGPT to generate these responses?

Re-read the bkav story.

I think you will have to purchase a winrar license even for your school (assume you are the principal).

Then whine more, cry more and deboonk me. You have yet not spoken one sentence that has meaning. Not on Reddit, not on Lemmy. Not one, and I do not expect one.

No, my mission is to remove the privacy trashes.

Big tech aren't much harmed by your "privacy friendly" alternative. But they are harmed when everyone is a kernel developer.

Linus was right. You people really have no clue and understand zilch about computing and security.

You are trying to bring the conversation out of the topic.

Told me to name their innovations and then said something unrelated to the topic.

You already made it clear that “privacy” is “inferior” to “computer science”, one of the stupidest things I have ever heard in my life

As I saw, privacy communities are same in that stupid thought

But it is people's opinion

so you simply hate privacy communities due to your own delusions, blame them, have nothing to do with them yet still probably want to interact with them for some reason that originates back to your delusions. Keep them to yourself.

the privacy communities are much harmful than the big tech

because they remove people's knowledge by instructing people to do privacy & security hardening which does not gain people knowledge.

[–] TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 months ago

the privacy communities are much harmful than the big tech because they remove people's knowledge by instructing people to do privacy & security hardening which does not gain people knowledge.

I think this is all I needed to know about the level of delusion you have. You are advocating something as dumb as every environmental activist needing to do a PhD on biochemistry and geography, otherwise it would be impossible for climate activism to succeed, and that everyone should stop climate activism entirely.

The only thing you currently deserve for mocking everyone with such confidence is getting kicked for being a troll, so you either learn maturity and come back, or apply your hypothesis and be the change you want to see. I doubt you would even be entertained anywhere else for this long.