this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2024
44 points (100.0% liked)

UK Politics

3098 readers
177 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The retirement age will have to rise to 71 for middle-aged workers across the UK, according to research into the impact of growing life expectancy and falling birthrates on the state pension.

“But if you bring preventable ill health into the equation, that would have to increase even more,” added Mayhew, who is also professor of statistics at Bayes Business School and has advised the government on rises to the state pension age multiple times as a senior civil servant and in his current roles.

Jonathan Cribb, associate director and head of retirement at the Institute for Fiscal Studies, said that while he did not disagree with a higher pension age, increasing it without addressing other cost-saving measures was not “realistic or equitable”.

He added: “It would disproportionately impact poorer individuals whose ill-health means they have shorter lives, and so who receive pensions for less time.”

The Intergenerational Foundation, an independent thinktank, agreed that the pension age had to rise, but questioned on whose shoulders that cost should fall.

“Increasing the state pension age would be a terrible policy – a really bad way of attempting to make people more productive,” he said.


The original article contains 825 words, the summary contains 193 words. Saved 77%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

But if you bring preventable ill health into the equation, that would have to increase even more

Work until you're almost dead, and if you're healthy enough to actually enjoy retirement, then work some more!

[–] ComradeChairmanKGB@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The retirement age will have to rise to 71 for middle-aged workers across the UK

In what fucking universe is 71 "middle aged"? The life expectancy in the UK is only 82.

[–] Patch 2 points 9 months ago

They mean that the retirement age off in the future will rise to 71 for people who are middle aged (in their 30s maybe) today. Not that 71 is middle aged.