this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2024
1119 points (97.1% liked)

Memes

45730 readers
659 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
gary_host_laptop@lemmy.ml
sexy_peach@feddit.de
cyclohexane@lemmy.ml
cypherpunks@lemmy.ml
1119
My name is Guy Incognito (feddit.de)
submitted 9 months ago by Oiconomia@feddit.de to c/memes@lemmy.ml
75 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] frezik@midwest.social 6 points 9 months ago (2 children)

And we wouldn't need any of that if we implemented IPv6.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I don't know about that. Technically it wouldn't be necessary but I can see providers limiting you to a single IP instead of a /64 and needing to do it anyway, because the tech exists anyway. Or for privacy reasons. There is IPv6 NAT, after all...

[–] frezik@midwest.social 1 points 9 months ago

Most ISPs offer IPv6 right now, and they tend to hand out at least a /64. Often as much as a /54.

RIPE strongly discourages ISPs from handing out prefixes longer than /56: https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-690/

I don't see carrier grade NAT ever being used for IPv6. The extra equipment for that makes the network more expensive, less reliable, and introduces extra latency.

One thing ISPs are doing is still handing out dynamically assigned prefixes rather than static. Self hosting is still going to be a pain.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 months ago

In an ideal world, sure.