this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2024
549 points (97.1% liked)

Greentext

4357 readers
2691 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Early_To_Risa@sh.itjust.works
549
Anon helps people on StackOverflow (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 9 months ago by Early_To_Risa@sh.itjust.works to c/greentext@sh.itjust.works
42 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Japan_50@sh.itjust.works 8 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I don't know why you're getting down voted. That is how it works to my understanding (as a layperson). It was fed training data and is very good at predictive text. I don't think it can take concepts it's learned and apply them in novel ways.

[–] danielbln@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] jpeps@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

This is hilarious but I don't think fully answers the question. This is a good example of something novel that GPT can do, ie manipulating language according to new rules to create rhythm and rhymes.

However, to give a more over the top example: if you removed all mention of planes from its corpus, leaving only information on air resistance and materials science, and then asked it for the best way to cross the Atlantic, it would never invent a plane for you.

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Even if it could, there are a lot of APIs or documentation that it hasn't been trained on enough or at all to be able to answer. The models can, at least currently, only contain so much information, so the more specific or detailed the response you need, the worse it'll do.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Deciding what to write next based on what it just wrote is reasoning. So saying "it's just predicting the next word" is very dismissive if you haven't used it.

My personal experience was I spent hours googling a for a script. I gave up and typed my problem into chatgpt. It gave working code in seconds.

It wasn't just cutting and pasting what was already on Google.